I think I'm inclined to agree with Chaplol. Maybe there should be a single thread for this kind of thing. But also, if the players don't actually improve their behavior, there is no point, it could be interpreted as an ego thing. And so far, from my experience, Logix hasn't (pinging is still excessive), but I'll wait a bit more.
As for Fortress, I've had a bad game with him, where he had 0 army value, yet complained the most and resigned early. It really baffles me when people who have nothing but their com and maybe a strider or a super to control or "just build eco" for 40 minutes* act in such disruptive ways, as if they are actually under pressure of fighting a frontline, controlling many units, thinking of how to advance or fighting a greater amount of higher skilled players. There is 0 pressure on you and you put more on your teammates. And then you say "if no one will scout I will waste a nuke". Why? What is the point of wasting a nuke? Just to spite your team? From this, I can only assume you let your emotions take over you.
*
[Spoiler]Effects of such unit-less gameplay can be argued to be positive or negative, zero-k is a very complex game and it is hard to evaluate the correctness of this type of play. Of course, it is a widely accepted type of play that sometimes wins games too. Sometimes it may contribute to concentration of metal in the hands of higher skilled players and allows them to focus on making units exclusively, other times it hurts the team by stretching their micro skills and attention thin. I have nothing against people who play this way, as long as their communications and actions are not severely disruptive.
