Hi, question

How are you actually using these values?

Does the difference between, say, Dagger and Bolas vs. Glaive mean you're making exclusively Bolas vs. mono Glaive, or just investing more in Bolas than Daggers?

With Dart and Scorcher vs. Kodachi, do the unfavorable matchups with both mean you're trying to exit the raider phase entirely as soon as you see lots of Kodachis? Do you take into account the synergy of Dart-Scorcher pairs vs. other heavy raiders?

Does the comparatively unfavorable matchup of Glaives vs. Scorchers as opposed to other Glaives mean you're making fewer Glaives vs. Rovers to avoid being countered, or more Glaives to help overcome the mild disadvantage?

How do you figure out what proportions to make counters in, if the opponent has shown, say, both Darts and Scorchers?

Well, in practice raiders are often built to counter expansions rather than other raiders. And the ideal for this role is to have them arrive at a target expansion as it's being built. So, assuming you embed this into your logic, your widget might still make raiders that have a bad matchup into enemy raiders.

Your widget also needs a cost filter, based on your current income and army value, so that you don't get stuck with a demistrider in the queue for several minutes of the early game while the stuff it's supposed to counter runs rampant.

On the topic of mixed raider compositions, the two vehicle examples act differently. As I mentioned earlier, some bad raider matchups for Scorchers become positive when there's one Dart in the composition because, while the Dart dies in exchange for the slow, it lets the Scorcher get on top of its target. Daggers, on the other hand, have a bunch of negative matchups turn positive when they hit critical mass to kill the target in a single salvo, so switching away from them to a riot may be an error that devalues all your existing Daggers.