| 1 |
What trades did I say were "worth it"? I'm rewatching the game and I can't find where I said that. The only terrible trade I can think of is Fealthas attacking the north-east, and I didn't say it was "worth it", I said the defense using only a few ducks was moderately efficient. Rewatching it I realize that I wasn't clear that by "efficiency" I meant how much of @ivand's army was being devoted to that area of the map.
|
1 |
What trades did I say were "worth it"? I'm rewatching the game and I can't find where I said that. The only terrible trade I can think of is Fealthas attacking the north-east, and I didn't say it was "worth it", I said the defense using only a few ducks was moderately efficient. Rewatching it I realize that I wasn't clear that by "efficiency" I meant how much of @ivand's army was being devoted to that area of the map.
|
| 3 |
Also,
@Fealthas
could
probably
have
won
it
if
they
had
realized
they
were
the
only
one
with
units
at
the
start.
It's
one
of
those
things
that
benefits
from
hindsight,
but
I
really
did
get
the
impression
that
@Fealthas
played
with
the
assumption
that
@ivand
had
a
much
larger
defense
and
army
than
they
really
did.
@Fealthas
is
the
only
one
who
knows
for
sure,
but
I
get
the
impression
there
were
a
lot
of
bad
reads
early
on
that
@ivand
used
well.
Shame
the
missile
silo
didn't
do
much.
|
3 |
Also,
@Fealthas
could
probably
have
won
it
if
they
had
realized
they
were
the
only
one
with
units
at
the
start.
It's
one
of
those
things
that
benefits
from
hindsight,
but
I
really
did
get
the
impression
that
@Fealthas
played
with
the
assumption
that
@ivand
had
a
much
larger
defense
and
army
than
they
really
did.
@Fealthas
is
the
only
one
who
knows
for
sure,
but
I
get
the
impression
there
were
a
lot
of
bad
reads
early
on
that
@ivand
used
well.
Shame
the
missile
silo
didn't
do
much,
given
how
big
of
an
economic
focus
it
was.
|
B343535 2 on Iced Coffee v4.3 (Multiplayer)