Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

caretaker

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
5/8/2015 9:53:39 PMAUrankSmokeDragon before revert after revert
5/8/2015 9:53:04 PMAUrankSmokeDragon before revert after revert
Before After
1 this is some good advice =) it was helpful and not mockery.. i will build a few more cons and do my best.. thank you 1 this is some good advice =) it was helpful and not mockery.. i will build a few more cons and do my best.. thank you
2 \n 2 \n
3 i still feel tho that aa has a hard time dealing with nuclear bomber strikes on coms i suppose if they loose the bomber and i can reclaim then that will have to do. 3 i still feel tho that aa has a hard time dealing with nuclear bomber strikes on coms i suppose if they loose the bomber and i can reclaim then that will have to do.
4 \n 4 \n
5 Pxtl i am worried your idea might cause the resulting unit composition without any strategic weakness. . it might unbalance the game mby. . because if your getting hit by cloakies you kill a few and then you have cloakies. . that might mean that when an army reaches critical mass it could be unstoppable as it may collect vast numbers of mixed unit types and gather speed in doing so. 5 Pxtl i am worried your idea might cause the resulting unit composition to be without any strategic weakness. . it might unbalance the game mby. . because if your getting hit by cloakies you kill a few and then you have cloakies. . that might mean that when an army reaches critical mass it could be unstoppable as it may collect vast numbers of mixed unit types and gather speed in doing so.