Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

seperate FFA elo

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
11/17/2015 5:54:42 PMDErankBrackman before revert after revert
11/17/2015 5:45:57 PMDErankBrackman before revert after revert
11/17/2015 5:44:37 PMDErankBrackman before revert after revert
Before After
1 [quote]Is the FFA ladder proposal meant to be purely competitive, or help with balance somehow? If so, then how?[/quote]For Team FFA. And to keep FFAs from falsifying team elo. 1 [quote]Is the FFA ladder proposal meant to be purely competitive, or help with balance somehow? If so, then how?[/quote]For Team FFA. And to keep FFAs from falsifying team elo. The question is always if the improvement is worth the complexity, but there will be a little improvement.
2 \n 2 \n
3 [quote]Also need a separate 2v2 ladder, a separate 4v4 ladder, and a separate ladder for people who defeat CAI without losing any units.[/quote][quote]there should be small teams ladder as well: 3 [quote]Also need a separate 2v2 ladder, a separate 4v4 ladder, and a separate ladder for people who defeat CAI without losing any units.[/quote][quote]there should be small teams ladder as well:
4 2vs2 up to 4vs4[/quote]You wouldn't even need seperate elos for every team size. You could just use a weighted average of 1v1 elo and team elo and its changes depending on team sizes. If n is the average team size (2.5 in a 2v3) you would use 1v1elo/n+(1-1/n)*teamelo. Just a random idea. 4 2vs2 up to 4vs4[/quote]You wouldn't even need seperate elos for every team size. You could just use a weighted average of 1v1 elo and team elo and its changes depending on team sizes. If n is the average team size (2.5 in a 2v3) you would use 1v1elo/n+(1-1/n)*teamelo. Just a random idea.