| 1 |
I have not noticed any issues with imgur.com image hosting (pictures from years ago still up), and they appear to be doing just fine so it seems unlikely that images hosted there will disappear. Storage space is cheap.
|
1 |
I have not noticed any issues with imgur.com image hosting (pictures from years ago still up), and they appear to be doing just fine so it seems unlikely that images hosted there will disappear. Storage space is cheap.
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
I personally despise all those custom image uploading forms. Every service/software/site that wants to do it makes one from scratch, and they end up mediocre. Then you have to deal with all the security aspects...
|
3 |
I personally despise all those custom image uploading forms. Every service/software/site that wants to do it makes one from scratch, and they end up mediocre. Then you have to deal with all the security aspects...
|
| 4 |
I
mean,
why
would
you
reimplement
an
image
hosting
service?
That
sounds
like
[i]a
lot[/i]
of
development
time
for
virtually
zero
gain
to
the
people
wanting
to
write
wiki
pages.
We
have
lots
of
the
latter
and
are
short
on
the
former.
.
.
|
4 |
I
mean,
why
would
you
reimplement
an
image
hosting
service
(
because
that's
what
it
really
is)
?
That
sounds
like
[i]a
lot[/i]
of
development
time
for
virtually
zero
gain
to
the
people
wanting
to
write
wiki
pages.
We
have
lots
of
the
latter
and
are
short
on
the
former.
.
.
|
| 5 |
\n
|
5 |
\n
|
| 6 |
Additionally, .webm is a thing.
|
6 |
Additionally, .webm is a thing.
|
[2up]knorke Bug Discussion