| 1 |
[quote]I have not noticed any issues with imgur.com image hosting [/quote]That is not an original thought.
|
1 |
[quote]I have not noticed any issues with imgur.com image hosting [/quote]That is not an original thought.
|
| 2 |
[i]I have not noticed any issues with photobucket.com image hosting
|
2 |
[i]I have not noticed any issues with photobucket.com image hosting
|
| 3 |
I have not noticed any issues with tinypic.com image hosting
|
3 |
I have not noticed any issues with tinypic.com image hosting
|
| 4 |
I have not noticed any issues with mydigckpics.om image hosting[/i]
|
4 |
I have not noticed any issues with mydigckpics.om image hosting[/i]
|
| 5 |
\n
|
5 |
\n
|
| 6 |
This discussion I have now seen too often. It is absolutely shortsighted and stupid. One does not host pictures for homepage on third party pic-hosters.
|
6 |
This discussion I have now seen too often. It is absolutely shortsighted and stupid. One does not host pictures for homepage on third party pic-hosters.
|
| 7 |
It is nein nein nein.
|
7 |
It is nein nein nein.
|
| 8 |
\n
|
8 |
\n
|
| 9 |
random private homepage is not acceptable either.
|
9 |
random private homepage is not acceptable either.
|
| 10 |
\n
|
10 |
\n
|
| 11 |
[img]they
appear
to
be
doing
just
fine
so
it
seems
unlikely
that
images
hosted
there
will
disappear[/img]I
have
no
idea
how
imgur
is
doing
financially
or
what
their
plans
are.
|
11 |
[quote]they
appear
to
be
doing
just
fine
so
it
seems
unlikely
that
images
hosted
there
will
disappear[/quote]I
have
no
idea
how
imgur
is
doing
financially
or
what
their
plans
are.
|
| 12 |
Sometimes
pichosters
still
work
but
not
for
embeding:
Not
dead
but
unfunctional.
|
12 |
Sometimes
pic-hosters
still
work
but
not
for
embeding:
Not
dead
but
unfunctional.
|
| 13 |
google.code will/has disappeared too, at least to me that was a surprise.
|
13 |
google.code will/has disappeared too, at least to me that was a surprise.
|
| 14 |
(Will be funny when it goes down completly and all the images and direct links to pages stop working.)
|
14 |
(Will be funny when it goes down completly and all the images and direct links to pages stop working.)
|
| 15 |
\n
|
15 |
\n
|
| 16 |
Really it is about much more than "I hope the image link still works next year."
|
16 |
Really it is about much more than "I hope the image link still works next year."
|
| 17 |
pic-hosters produce gibberish filenames: h89u3h5ewr.jpg
|
17 |
pic-hosters produce gibberish filenames: h89u3h5ewr.jpg
|
| 18 |
\n
|
18 |
\n
|
| 19 |
There is no way to backup all images at once.
|
19 |
There is no way to backup all images at once.
|
| 20 |
(maybe if one common gallery/account was used. but it is not)
|
20 |
(maybe if one common gallery/account was used. but it is not)
|
| 21 |
Of wiki you can make a complete backup, with all pages and attached files, everything.
|
21 |
Of wiki you can make a complete backup, with all pages and attached files, everything.
|
| 22 |
\n
|
22 |
\n
|
| 23 |
If an image is used on multiple pages and you want to edit/replace it:
|
23 |
If an image is used on multiple pages and you want to edit/replace it:
|
| 24 |
You have to edit every single page and change the url.
|
24 |
You have to edit every single page and change the url.
|
| 25 |
(In wiki you can edit the file.)
|
25 |
(In wiki you can edit the file.)
|
| 26 |
\n
|
26 |
\n
|
| 27 |
If the url of hosting site changes then you need to edit every single page and image.
|
27 |
If the url of hosting site changes then you need to edit every single page and image.
|
| 28 |
(on wiki images are embeded without path, just the filename: "picture.jpg")
|
28 |
(on wiki images are embeded without path, just the filename: "picture.jpg")
|
| 29 |
\n
|
29 |
\n
|
| 30 |
\n
|
30 |
\n
|
| 31 |
[quote]I personally despise all those custom image uploading forms. Every service/software/site that wants to do it makes one from scratch, and they end up mediocre. Then you have to deal with all the security aspects...[/quote]Yes.
|
31 |
[quote]I personally despise all those custom image uploading forms. Every service/software/site that wants to do it makes one from scratch, and they end up mediocre. Then you have to deal with all the security aspects...[/quote]Yes.
|
| 32 |
And zeroK-owned sites are not always reliable either. Those pictures were hosted on planet-wars.eu:
|
32 |
And zeroK-owned sites are not always reliable either. Those pictures were hosted on planet-wars.eu:
|
| 33 |
[img]http://i.imgur.com/Cli7kps.jpg[/img]
|
33 |
[img]http://i.imgur.com/Cli7kps.jpg[/img]
|
| 34 |
\n
|
34 |
\n
|
| 35 |
[quote]That sounds like a lot of development time for virtually zero gain to the people wanting to write wiki pages.[/quote]Should have told that to the people who want to make their own wiki/hosting stuff.
|
35 |
[quote]That sounds like a lot of development time for virtually zero gain to the people wanting to write wiki pages.[/quote]Should have told that to the people who want to make their own wiki/hosting stuff.
|
| 36 |
I said use existing crap. Like literally any system. Or even use the existing wikimedia-install of spring. Aber nein. Because no lobby-nicknames and no avatars.
|
36 |
I said use existing crap. Like literally any system. Or even use the existing wikimedia-install of spring. Aber nein. Because no lobby-nicknames and no avatars.
|
[2up]knorke Bug Discussion