| 1 |
[quote](
hokomoko's?)
[/quote]how
to
use
avatarwiki-forum:
http://zero-k.
info/PostHistory/Index/167905
|
1 |
[color=red]-
Too
many
lines,
no
real
content[/color]
|
| 2 |
\n
|
|
|
| 3 |
[quote]ZKL is slowly pushed towards the trash bin. Your info is extremely old and irrelevant now knorke.[/quote]No, that is excactly what makes this info relevant. Instead of a link to protocol-doc all you see are jokes about tubes and trains.
|
|
|
| 4 |
Today's state of the game is direct result of the attitude represented by those quotes.
|
|
|
| 5 |
\n
|
|
|
| 6 |
[quote]Also I'm unsure why are you against the first argument since you are all for the whole one lobby and one spring server idea. [/quote]You are mixing two completly different things.
|
|
|
| 7 |
\n
|
|
|
| 8 |
When zK fanboys say "one lobby" they mean: To put zeroK on steam it needs one very good lobby-client.
|
|
|
| 9 |
Often they act as if such very good lobby-client already exists. This believe got zeroK on steam greenlit. (but not any further because just believing was not enough)
|
|
|
| 10 |
\n
|
|
|
| 11 |
What I mean is the original spring model: One lobby-server, with as many lobby-clients as peoplers want to develop - with no lobby-client being artifically castrated to only work with specifique games. (= dickmove)
|
|
|
| 12 |
\n
|
|
|
| 13 |
[quote]Then why you need learn about networking? Why not start learn how engine works and try add that features?[/quote]because engine changes are not nessecary for trains.
|
|
|
Zero-K Networking