| 1 |
Are we trying to make our own game, coming up with a new kind of RTS, or are we trying to ride the PA train [size=1]factory[/size] and get everybody on board by their nostalgia? Wouldn't it be more suitable to apply our interface and infrastructure to BA?
|
1 |
Are we trying to make our own game, coming up with a new kind of RTS, or are we trying to ride the PA train [size=1]factory[/size] and get everybody on board by their nostalgia? Wouldn't it be more suitable to apply our interface and infrastructure to BA?
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
I know it's the easier way to get others interested by showing them something formerly successful and presenting a successor, but I believe ZK is exactly not trying to be the free to play supcom rip-off. What impression does it make when you come in here and see exact copies of TA, SupCom or StarCraft maps being played?
|
3 |
I know it's the easier way to get others interested by showing them something formerly successful and presenting a successor, but I believe ZK is exactly not trying to be the free to play supcom rip-off. What impression does it make when you come in here and see exact copies of TA, SupCom or StarCraft maps being played?
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
CCR
could
be
a
virtual
combat
arena.
A
perfectly
flat
map
(
not
even
any
of
those
annoying
craters
for
@Skasi
)
.
Maybe
using
the
tron
shader
to
make
it
visually
interesting.
Or
a
part
of
an
industrial
complex.
There
are
many
reasons
for
a
map
to
be
flat,
but
the
surface
of
a
cratered
comet
just
really
isn't.
|
5 |
CCR
could
be
a
virtual
combat
arena.
A
perfectly
flat
map
(
not
even
any
of
those
annoying
craters
for
@Skasi
)
.
Maybe
using
the
tron
shader
to
make
it
visually
interesting.
Or
a
part
of
an
industrial
complex.
Or
the
surface
of
a
dyson
ring.
There
are
many
reasons
for
a
map
to
be
flat,
but
the
surface
of
a
cratered
comet
just
really
isn't.
|
Steam maps