Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

How to win Planetwars

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
4/10/2018 12:46:33 AMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
4/10/2018 12:43:03 AMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
4/10/2018 12:42:20 AMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
4/10/2018 12:40:55 AMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
Before After
1 [quote]Empire had the possibility, both Federation artifact planets were in direct attack range of Empire at that time. 1 [quote]Empire had the possibility, both Federation artifact planets were in direct attack range of Empire at that time.
2 \n 2 \n
3 For reasons which were much discussed in #zk earlier today, Empire did not feel compelled to pursue this option until it evaporated as gateway planets around the artifacts also fell. [/quote] 3 For reasons which were much discussed in #zk earlier today, Empire did not feel compelled to pursue this option until it evaporated as gateway planets around the artifacts also fell. [/quote]
4 From Empire's perspective it boiled down to "in a three-way FFA, it is the second-strongest faction's responsibility to stop the strongest faction from winning, and if they don't recognise that, that's their problem". 4 From Empire's perspective it boiled down to "in a three-way FFA, it is the second-strongest faction's responsibility to expend effort to stop the strongest faction from winning, and if they don't recognise that, that's their problem".
5 \n 5 \n
6 The third strongest faction is not inherently motivated to make the strongest faction not win, if doing so would merely make the currently second strongest faction win instead. 6 The third strongest faction is not inherently motivated to make the strongest faction not win, if doing so would merely make the currently second strongest faction win instead.