1 |
[quote]Empire had the possibility, both Federation artifact planets were in direct attack range of Empire at that time.
|
1 |
[quote]Empire had the possibility, both Federation artifact planets were in direct attack range of Empire at that time.
|
2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
3 |
For reasons which were much discussed in #zk earlier today, Empire did not feel compelled to pursue this option until it evaporated as gateway planets around the artifacts also fell. [/quote]
|
3 |
For reasons which were much discussed in #zk earlier today, Empire did not feel compelled to pursue this option until it evaporated as gateway planets around the artifacts also fell. [/quote]
|
4 |
From
Empire's
perspective
it
boiled
down
to
"in
a
three-way
FFA,
it
is
the
second-strongest
faction's
responsibility
to
stop
the
strongest
faction
from
winning,
and
if
they
don't
recognise
that,
that's
their
problem".
|
4 |
From
Empire's
perspective
it
boiled
down
to
"in
a
three-way
FFA,
it
is
the
second-strongest
faction's
responsibility
to
expend
effort
to
stop
the
strongest
faction
from
winning,
and
if
they
don't
recognise
that,
that's
their
problem".
|
5 |
\n
|
5 |
\n
|
6 |
The third strongest faction is not inherently motivated to make the strongest faction not win, if doing so would merely make the currently second strongest faction win instead.
|
6 |
The third strongest faction is not inherently motivated to make the strongest faction not win, if doing so would merely make the currently second strongest faction win instead.
|