| 1 |
The current radar scaling seems to be lacking, so I've come to propose an idea I've had in the back of my head for a while.
|
1 |
The current radar scaling seems to be lacking, so I've come to propose an idea I've had in the back of my head for a while.
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
The "seismic radar," the way i would like for it to work is:
|
3 |
The "seismic radar," the way i would like for it to work is:
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
1.
Track
the
movement
of
moving
units
only,
no
aerial
or
static
buildings(
literally
means
|
5 |
1.
Track
the
movement
of
moving
units
only,
no
aerial
or
static
buildings(
literally
means
it
only
sees
units
moving
on
the
ground)
|
| 6 |
2. Range of somewhere around 3000 Elmo
|
6 |
2. Range of somewhere around 3000 Elmo
|
| 7 |
3. A mid range price, 150-250
|
7 |
3. A mid range price, 150-250
|
| 8 |
\n
|
8 |
\n
|
| 9 |
I find the current disparity between radars to seem a bit strange, seeing as how the price ramps up so much for what is a 50% increase in range, kinda making it not feel like a natural step up but more of just a late game option when it doesn't require much to be used.
|
9 |
I find the current disparity between radars to seem a bit strange, seeing as how the price ramps up so much for what is a 50% increase in range, kinda making it not feel like a natural step up but more of just a late game option when it doesn't require much to be used.
|
| 10 |
https://gyazo.com/b3b3a1724fce08bb54c2f2a80a2ec52e
|
10 |
https://gyazo.com/b3b3a1724fce08bb54c2f2a80a2ec52e
|
| 11 |
^current stats for advanced radar based on the wiki
|
11 |
^current stats for advanced radar based on the wiki
|
| 12 |
https://gyazo.com/e07599f9af1298604cf0c5108d9cad41
|
12 |
https://gyazo.com/e07599f9af1298604cf0c5108d9cad41
|
| 13 |
^current stats for radar tower based on the wiki
|
13 |
^current stats for radar tower based on the wiki
|
| 14 |
\n
|
14 |
\n
|
Seismic radar