Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Admin Abuse of Hokomoko

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
4/25/2019 8:54:48 PMATrankhokomoko before revert after revert
Before After
1 @snoke it seems that I didn't explain myself well enough, so I'll try to be more informative here: 1 @snoke it seems that I didn't explain myself well enough, so I'll try to be more informative here:
2 You said "that was lame" in public chat when spectating which is not a big offence, and doesn't warrant a punishment. 2 You said "that was lame" in public chat when spectating which is not a big offence, and doesn't warrant a punishment.
3 It is, however, frowned upon, as it doesn't make ZK a nice place to be in. Note that as a spectator your chat automates to spec-chat, which means you deliberately switched into public chat to notify the players about your negative view of their actions. 3 It is, however, frowned upon, as it doesn't make ZK a nice place to be in. Note that as a spectator your chat automates to spec-chat, which means you deliberately switched into public chat to notify the players about your negative view of their actions.
4 While this was not a big violation of the CoC, I still wanted you to stop it, because I do want people to enjoy playing ZK. 4 While this was not a big violation of the CoC, I still wanted you to stop it, because I do want people to enjoy playing ZK.
5 I also want to point out that were you a frustrated player on either team, I'd probably ignore this altogether. 5 I also want to point out that were you a frustrated player on either team, I'd probably ignore this altogether.
6 \n 6 \n
7 All in all, I believe the severity of the response (saying "enough commentary snoke") was proportional to the action (saying "that was lame"). 7 All in all, I believe the severity of the response (saying "enough commentary snoke") was proportional to the action (saying "that was lame").
8 \n 8 \n
9 \n 9 \n
10 The line about the consequences was taking into account prior offences and your history of impoliteness. It was meant to remind you to think about what you say and how you say it in general and not about the "this is lame" line. I apologise if this wasn't clear. 10 The line about the consequences was taking into account prior offences and your history of impoliteness. It was meant to remind you to think about what you say and how you say it in general and not about the "this is lame" line. I apologise if this wasn't clear.
11 \n 11 \n
12 \n 12 \n
13 If you think that informing players as a spectator that their actions are lame makes them enjoy your company and the game more than they would have if you hadn't, I'd be happy to hear your reasoning. 13 If you think that informing players as a spectator that their actions are lame makes them enjoy your company and the game more than they would have if you hadn't, I'd be happy to hear your reasoning.
14 \n
15 I also want to remind everyone that if there's an issue with actions taken by admins, the most effective way to resolve it is through contacting another admin or through reports. By making a forum thread you more or less force the admins to close their ranks, which should be the worst result from your perspective.