Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

2 coms win rate

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
10/5/2020 9:46:01 AMEErankAdminAnarchid before revert after revert
Before After
1 [q]35 games and 2 com team lost 3 more battles than won.[/q] 1 [q]35 games and 2 com team lost 3 more battles than won.[/q]
2 So 16 vs 19. That's not very good evidence of double com being OP, but it's adequate evidence of the double com mechanism being accurately understood by the balancing system. 2 So 16 vs 19. That's not very good evidence of double com being OP, but it's adequate evidence of the double com mechanism being accurately understood by the balancing system.
3 \n
4 [q] And spying on one more person involved in this thread(not me), 75 recent games: 44 wins and 31 losses where 2 coms were involved.[/q]
5 This seems the only one of the people-samples that diverges from roughly 50% chance. Interesting, but attributable to that guy being on a roll at that point, and even then the effect size seems fairly small.
6 \n
7 I guess the real takeout here is that double com team is not more likely to [i]lose[/i], it seems.