1 |
I'd imagine the only person benefitting from the lance-blasting of a 1% lotus nanoframe is the sufferer of severe OCD. No more illegitimate radar dot to plague the mindscape.
|
1 |
I'd imagine the only person benefitting from the lance-blasting of a 1% lotus nanoframe is the sufferer of severe OCD. No more illegitimate radar dot to plague the mindscape.
|
2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
3 |
I can't believe it's taken us this long to bring it back up again really. Combat terraform was banhammered so hard that you'd think combat nano be treated as equally cancerous. Well, why not?
|
3 |
I can't believe it's taken us this long to bring it back up again really. Combat terraform was banhammered so hard that you'd think combat nano be treated as equally cancerous. Well, why not?
|
4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
5 |
This need not be a sweeping AI change though - you do want your raiders and riots and <= stinger porc to blast would-be-picket nanos. So you somehow have to cleverly apply it to skirmishers/artillery with an option to override...
|
5 |
This need not be a sweeping AI change though - you do want your raiders and riots and <= stinger porc to blast would-be-picket nanos. So you somehow have to cleverly apply it to skirmishers/artillery with an option to override...
|
6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
7 |
We
have
"do
not
shoot
at
radar
dots",
well,
do
not
shoot
at
nanoframes
unless
explicitly
told
to?
|
7 |
We
have
"do
not
shoot
at
radar
dots",
well
how
about
"do
not
shoot
at
nanoframes
unless
explicitly
told
to"?
|