Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

David vs Goliath: Rovers vs Tanks

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
7/7/2024 9:59:44 PMUSrankKerr before revert after revert
Before After
1 Blitz vs ravager is favorable to rover, at scale. If the blitz can use it's full maneuverability then they can win. It's best to limit this with a few fencers or rippres, which will do well in a mix against blitz... 1 Blitz vs ravager is favorable to rover, at scale. If the blitz can use it's full maneuverability then they can win. It's best to limit this with a few fencers or rippres, which will do well in a mix against blitz...
2 \n 2 \n
3 and blitz is just not good against so many other things 3 and blitz is just not good against so many other things
4 \n 4 \n
5 Ravagers have much better hp and dps for cost than tanks. Careful retreating of damaged units to prevent losses will allow them to overpower tanks. This means singling out one tank at a time to kill, and committing to it. 5 Ravagers have much better hp and dps for cost than tanks. Careful retreating of damaged units to prevent losses will allow them to overpower tanks. This means singling out one tank at a time to kill, and committing to it.
6 \n 6 \n
7 Since tanks still move at a decent pace, for retreat, it's often very useful to make a silo for slow/emp to force favorable engagements. 7 Since tanks still move at a decent pace, for retreat, it's often very useful to make a silo for slow/emp to force favorable engagements against them. I would guess that 10 slowed minotaur would lose badly to 1/4 their cost in ravagers.