| 1 |
I feel like Bucky addressed your argument squarely and convincingly.
|
1 |
I feel like Bucky addressed your argument squarely and convincingly.
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
You say the damage is low, they show that it is higher than other comparable units.
|
3 |
You say the damage is low, they show that it is higher than other comparable units.
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
You say it's low for cost, they show it's marginally higher than comparable units when adjusted for cost.
|
5 |
You say it's low for cost, they show it's marginally higher than comparable units when adjusted for cost.
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
Is
there
any
evidence
he
could
possibly
produce
that
could
change
your
mind?
It
doesn't
get
much
clearer
than
what
they've
given
you
but
you
down-vote
their
efforts
without
addressing
what
they've
said.
Sad!
|
7 |
Is
there
any
evidence
he
could
possibly
produce
that
could
change
your
mind?
It
doesn't
get
much
clearer
than
what
they've
given
you
but
you
down-vote
their
efforts
without
addressing
what
they've
said.
|