Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Co dev-lobsters wanted !

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
9/17/2026 3:06:24 PMSErankPLT_Godde before revert after revert
9/17/2026 3:05:57 PMSErankPLT_Godde before revert after revert
Before After
1 [quote]Specifically regarding the glaive vs blitz interaction i think large number of blitz say 5 vs 20 glaives will win the engagement, no ?[/quote] 1 [quote]Specifically regarding the glaive vs blitz interaction i think large number of blitz say 5 vs 20 glaives will win the engagement, no ?[/quote]
2 \n 2 \n
3 Blitz has no AoE(Area of Effect/splash damage), but how Blitz scales against Glaives is still quite complicated. Each lighting shot from the Blitz only hits 1 target. 3 Blitz has no AoE(Area of Effect/splash damage), but how Blitz scales against Glaives is still quite complicated. Each lighting shot from the Blitz only hits 1 target.
4 \n 4 \n
5 It just takes 3 Glaives to defeat a single Blitz if the Glaives are in range of the Blitz. 5 It just takes 3 Glaives to defeat a single Blitz if the Glaives are in range of the Blitz.
6 However, if the Blitz can 1v1 the Glaives, it takes something like 8 Glaives to kill a blitz. 6 However, if the Blitz can 1v1 the Glaives, it takes something like 8 Glaives to kill a blitz.
7 Yet again, since the Blitz has longer range than the Glaive, it can also be able to kill the Glaive before it enters range. 7 Yet again, since the Blitz has longer range than the Glaive, it can also be able to kill the Glaive before it enters range.
8 Glaives are faster than Blitzes but if the Blitzes can kill the Glaives before they can fire back, Blitzes can kill infinite amount of Glaives with no losses. 8 Glaives are faster than Blitzes but if the Blitzes can kill the Glaives before they can fire back, Blitzes can kill infinite amount of Glaives with no losses.
9 \n 9 \n
10 I'm not sure which scenario is the most realistic or important when you want to decide the match-up between Glaive and Blitz in an actual game between players. 10 I'm not sure which scenario is the most realistic or important when you want to decide the match-up between Glaive and Blitz in an actual game between players.
11 \n 11 \n
12 Kodachi has a more favorable match-up against Glaives than Blitz does. 12 Kodachi has a more favorable match-up against Glaives than Blitz does.
13 \n 13 \n
14 If 3 Glaives can get in range of a single Kodachi and they are all spread out enough to avoid the splash damage, they will get a costeffective trade, only losing 1 Glaive in the process. 14 If 3 Glaives can get in range of a single Kodachi and they are all spread out enough to avoid the splash damage, they will get a costeffective trade, only losing 1 Glaive in the process.
15 \n 15 \n
16 However, while it might be feasible to chase a Blitz and get in range and kill the Blitz costeffectively, chasing a Kodachi with Glaives is basically suicide and it is basically impossible to make a costeffective trade against a retreating Kodachi unless you can surround it first. 16 However, while it might be feasible to chase a Blitz and get in range and kill the Blitz costeffectively, chasing a Kodachi with Glaives is basically suicide and it is basically impossible to make a costeffective trade against a retreating Kodachi unless you can surround it first.
17 \n 17 \n
18 Now, if the objective is just to protect a target against a single kodachi, 3 Glaives can do that, because the Kodachi will lose if it just drives straight into the Glaives. 18 Now, if the objective is just to protect a target against a single kodachi, 3 Glaives can do that, because the Kodachi will lose if it just drives straight into the Glaives.
19 \n 19 \n
20 I'm not sure if all those scenarios can be rolled into a single number, a single ratio. 20 I'm not sure if all those scenarios can be rolled into a single number, a single ratio, a single dimension.
21 \n 21 \n
22 \n 22 \n