| 1 |
[quote]There is no need for LV to fight Mace head-on with armies of equal value.
|
1 |
[quote]There is no need for LV to fight Mace head-on with armies of equal value.
|
| 2 |
Mace is slow and LV is fast[/quote]
|
2 |
Mace is slow and LV is fast[/quote]
|
| 3 |
1) Mace is not really "slow".
|
3 |
1) Mace is not really "slow".
|
| 4 |
2) If everything else can fight it, while you have to go around, then you are playing a handicap factory.
|
4 |
2) If everything else can fight it, while you have to go around, then you are playing a handicap factory.
|
| 5 |
\n
|
5 |
\n
|
| 6 |
[quote] Anarchid is trying to smurf! D:[/quote]
|
6 |
[quote] Anarchid is trying to smurf! D:[/quote]
|
| 7 |
More like tanking my elo. Though i very much doubt anyone will win this.
|
7 |
More like tanking my elo. Though i very much doubt anyone will win this.
|
|
|
8 |
\n
|
|
|
9 |
[quote] :P slashers are stronk vs mace when on the defencive[/quote]
|
|
|
10 |
The specific force composition you laid out earlier (slasher+leveler) sounds like a very fragile thing to bet on, especially if you need to catch the mace-line in a T enfilade. However, you get bonus points for using things that put the hurt on Daggers as well.
|
|
|
11 |
\n
|
|
|
12 |
Wanna play it out?
|
Contest: Defeating the Mace as LV