Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   
Map: ScorpioBattleground
 ScorpioBattleground
Title: TEAMS: All welcome!
Host: CZrankSpringiee2
Game version: Zero-K v1.2.9.9
Engine version: 91.0
Battle ID: 298181
Started: 10 years ago
Duration: 33 minutes
Players: 9
Bots: False
Mission: False
Rating: Casual
Watch Replay Now
Manual download

Team 1 Lost
Chance of victory: 52.1%
XP gained: 86
DErankSaandro86 died in 35 minutes
RUrankTwinH died in 35 minutes
FRrankBlueTemplar died in 32 minutes
FRranksergentmargas died in 35 minutes
Team 2 Won!
Chance of victory: 47.9%
XP gained: 95
ATrankRomux
USrankentropy3
USrankpear
HRrankIMajoI
DErankazak
Spectators
ATrankhokomoko
USrankStrog
ITrankHailMegatron




Preview
Filter:    Player:  
sort

USrankRyMarq
10 years ago
On the left is a reasonable example of an unusual ship v amph matchup, showing how all the various amph units tend to work against ships in a direct fight.
+1 / -0
USrankAutoWar
10 years ago
This could not be DErankazak first game, in spite of all appearances.
He had good unit composition and pressed the attack and held the defense competently.
+0 / -0

GBrankTheEloIsALie
10 years ago
He's a mojjj smurf :P
+0 / -0

DErankAdminmojjj
10 years ago
[disclaimer]
i could not find that smurfing itself is forbidden, according to the current CoC. intentionally ruining other's game experience is.
[/discalimer]

but: no, i dont smurf. i dont get it, why people do this other than accountability, and thats not my thing.
+0 / -0
GBrankTheSponge
10 years ago
There is nothing in the CoC that explicitly says playing with alts is prohibited. As such it comes down to whether screwing up balance by playing with a smurf counts as "wilfully acting to degrade to worsen the experience of others" or not. AFAIK there is no clear stance on this and is is assessed case by case (I could be wrong on that though).
+0 / -0

PLrankAdminSprung
10 years ago
USrankAutoWar: if you believe he is a smurf, then a report is likely to be more effective than a battle comment because admins aren't guaranteed to read those (if you did both, then sorry, we can't see pending reports).
+0 / -0

FRrankBlueTemplar
10 years ago
quote:
On the left is a reasonable example of an unusual ship v amph matchup, showing how all the various amph units tend to work against ships in a direct fight.

Yeah, well, I think this was the first time I've played amphs in 2 years (so was sea I wanted to play instead), so I did what I do when I'm not sure what to build : I make what seems like a balanced mix of units in the factory and set it to repeat. For the same reason, don't expect smart unit micro from me.
+0 / -0
USrankAutoWar
10 years ago
(edited 10 years ago)
@bluetemplar you did great against ships! Bouys worked wonders against Hunters as they halved the attack speed and attacked from out of range. The archers worked nicely to distract AI targeting as they appeared and rocketed out of range while dealing some damage.
Your doom was the mass Hunter ball. Hunters can shoot through eachother, meaning critical mass Hunter is as bad in sea as critical mass Brawlers on land!

PLrankAdminSprung GBrankTheSponge DErankAdminmojjj i believe azak was no "anteep smurf" just a "normal smurf" a player playing on a new account while pretending to be new to the game.
+0 / -0

PLrankAdminSprung
10 years ago
Anteep smurf or not, reports are always better done through the report button than the forum. Admins are not guaranteed to read forums, while they're forced to join #zkadmin (and are dragged back if they attempt to leave) and get rung every time there is a report.
+0 / -0

DErankAdminmojjj
10 years ago
lel. nobody said anything about anteep. but it seems that the term smurf and his name have become one.
+1 / -0
USrankAutoWar
10 years ago
My point was that atak did nothing report worthy.

he did not detract from the game in any obvious way.

i guess i'm just desensitized to regular smurfs :P
+0 / -0