Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Forum index  > Wiki   > Notes   >

Small FFA map pool

[MapPoolFFA]

5 posts, 1075 views
Post comment
Filter:    Player:  
sort
(3-way FFA)
La Isla Bonita v1
Deserted Third v4
Green River Confluence v10
Trefoil_v2
ThreeReefs16
Ternion
DesertTriad
Aberdeen3v3v3

(4-way FFA)
Tombstone Desert V2
rysia
Energy Spire Plain
Twilight_Canyon-v01
Small Volcano
Coagulation Marsh 0.7
Altored_Arctic

(5-way FFA)
Violence_4.2
Aum_1.1
Azure Rampart
BlackStar

view edit history
+1 / -0
USrankJasper
Edits: 2
First: 8 years ago
Last: 8 years ago

8 years ago
FFA won't have a matchmaker so doesn't need a map pool.
+0 / -0
8 years ago
GBrankAdminDeinFreund asked me to make this list its here for FFA players.
+0 / -0
quote:

FFA won't have a matchmaker so doesn't need a map pool.


This final? Resign inc
+0 / -0
Even if FFA doesn't have matchmaking, if there's going to be a pre-loaded list of maps for the whole Steam-download-version thing a curated list of good FFA maps is desirable.

(For the record, I once queued for FFA in Starcraft 2 at the height of its popularity. I waited in the queue for 30 minutes only to be placed in a game with 3 people who were clearly friends.

I know what you're thinking - they ganged up on me. Not so. Quite the reverse, in fact... they all instantly resigned. I queued again, got the same three people, they instantly resigned again.

The moral of the story is that FFA is unlikely to ever be sufficiently popular that a matchmaker is a better idea than a custom lobby. Furthermore, I have always found FFA to be more of a social affair, which further pushes one towards custom lobbies.)

tl;dr: I think a ZK FFA matchmaker is not feasible and has significant disadvantages compared to playing them in custom lobbies. Take my opinion with a grain of salt, since in ZK specifically my style does not lend itself very well to FFA so I rarely play them.
+1 / -0