Loading...

Forum index > General discussion >

AMD FX and engine 97

6 posts, 576 views

Post comment

Filter: Player:

sort
malric 9 years ago I am wondering if there are people around that use AMD FX processors and what is their experience with engine 97 compared to 91 in regards to performance. Currently in the source of the engine the detection of Intel features is a bit better and would like to know what is the feeling of people using AMD FX (the other AMD models are not influenced) +0 / -0
ElTorero 9 years ago fx6300 here Haven't played many games in 97 nor checked what engine runs faster, but it seems to run ok in the new one +0 / -0
Sortale 9 years ago post your spec here brother: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Asgbickq501_dGJoX3lwVzF1RW5DNzdPTllIQlBFblE&usp=sharing#gid=0 +0 / -0
malric 9 years ago ElTorero: thanks for the answer. One is not enough for a statistic, but until more answers appear, it seems that the AMD-FX is not a problem (AMD-FX shares 1 FPU per 2 logical cores) +0 / -0
blah1 9 years ago As I'd said in the other thread, I'm running an AMD FX-8350 on Linux, and I've been fine so far +0 / -0
Senaven 9 years ago I have FX6300. In 97 large map lagging. Sometimes long game after hard lagging crashes. In 91 all run fine. +0 / -0