| 1 |
[quote]So PLrankFailer you are talking about a mix of phenix and thunderbird? Multiple bombs of phenix and straid line like thunderbird with slow falling wyvern bombs?
|
1 |
[quote]So PLrankFailer you are talking about a mix of phenix and thunderbird? Multiple bombs of phenix and straid line like thunderbird with slow falling wyvern bombs?
|
| 2 |
If yes it sounds very OP to me.
|
2 |
If yes it sounds very OP to me.
|
| 3 |
But the idea is nice[/quote]
|
3 |
But the idea is nice[/quote]
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
Nah @Magman I was rather thinkign about 4 bombs (500 DMG each) dropped in a row, in a straight line with a tiny (windgen explosion-ish) AoE. Wyverns AoE is huuuge. Too big if u'd ask me.
|
5 |
Nah @Magman I was rather thinkign about 4 bombs (500 DMG each) dropped in a row, in a straight line with a tiny (windgen explosion-ish) AoE. Wyverns AoE is huuuge. Too big if u'd ask me.
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
@[ISP]Lauri Thats why I sugested structure-cluster bomber. Raven is too generalist. U make them and kill literally everything. Sea, ground, subs, buildings, even other air units.
|
7 |
@[ISP]Lauri Thats why I sugested structure-cluster bomber. Raven is too generalist. U make them and kill literally everything. Sea, ground, subs, buildings, even other air units.
|
| 8 |
\n
|
8 |
\n
|
| 9 |
If divided, anti unit bomber should have less dmg per cost, but higher mobility, the anti-buildings one should get more dmg per cost, but less mobility, so it's better to take out porc, high value targets, clustered bases etc.
|
9 |
If divided, anti unit bomber should have less dmg per cost, but higher mobility, the anti-buildings one should get more dmg per cost, but less mobility, so it's better to take out porc, high value targets, clustered bases etc.
|
| 10 |
\n
|
10 |
\n
|
| 11 |
[quote]Static targets do not have much more HP than mobile ones and they are rarely very important. If you look at 1v1 plane starts those tend to have Mex snipes and picking off raiders. I don't see a demand for a dedicated structure bomber because the anti-unit bomber can do the job fairly well if it has to. [/quote]
|
11 |
[quote]Static targets do not have much more HP than mobile ones and they are rarely very important. If you look at 1v1 plane starts those tend to have Mex snipes and picking off raiders. I don't see a demand for a dedicated structure bomber because the anti-unit bomber can do the job fairly well if it has to. [/quote]
|
| 12 |
\n
|
12 |
\n
|
| 13 |
Thats
what
makes
it
so
generalist.
Anti
unit
bomber
woudl
still
be
efficient
vs
mexes
in
1v1
games,
but
woudlnt
be
as
efficient
in
bigger
ones
|
13 |
Thats
what
makes
it
so
generalist.
Anti
unit
bomber
woudl
still
be
efficient
vs
mexes
in
1v1
games,
but
woudlnt
be
as
efficient
vs
big
structures
in
bigger
ones
|
RAGE POST: Air diving