| 1 |
[quote]I think you are quite harsh[/quote]
|
1 |
[quote]I think you are quite harsh[/quote]
|
| 2 |
Here's the gist:
|
2 |
Here's the gist:
|
| 3 |
1) @Smaggy's claim that "a bot is hardcoded into site" is erroneous.
|
3 |
1) @Smaggy's claim that "a bot is hardcoded into site" is erroneous.
|
| 4 |
2)
anyone
proposing
reimplementing
a
project
over
100
kloc
in
size
should
ideally
take
their
time
to
research
what
they're
asking
for.
(
For
reference:
an
older
checkout
of
[b]only[/b]
zero-k.
info,
without
the
other
components,
on
my
machine,
scores
at
[b]269881[/b]
lines)
|
4 |
2)
anyone
proposing
reimplementing
a
project
over
100
kloc
in
size
should
ideally
take
their
time
to
research
what
they're
asking
for.
(
For
reference:
an
older
checkout
of
[b]only[/b]
zero-k.
info,
without
the
other
components,
scores
at
[b]269881[/b]
lines)
|
| 5 |
3) Making such erroneous claim is evidence to contrary.
|
5 |
3) Making such erroneous claim is evidence to contrary.
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
Anyway: i'm merely suggesting that starting a project of reimplementing zkinfo does not require any permission, but someone would still have to do the work for it to happen.
|
7 |
Anyway: i'm merely suggesting that starting a project of reimplementing zkinfo does not require any permission, but someone would still have to do the work for it to happen.
|
| 8 |
\n
|
8 |
\n
|
| 9 |
Disclaimer: were such a project to gain any traction, i'd help.
|
9 |
Disclaimer: were such a project to gain any traction, i'd help.
|
zerok forum language switch question