Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

overpowered cheap units, which often bring game to shit from beginning

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
11/27/2014 10:25:18 AMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
11/27/2014 10:20:12 AMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
11/27/2014 10:18:12 AMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
11/27/2014 10:15:33 AMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
Before After
1 ...I can't think of a raider Duck loses to reliably. Dagger's a bit of a coinflip (IIRC larger numbers favour Dagger), but Dagger shares the high alpha and currently questionable balance of Ducks anyway. You probably have to kite Bandits and in low numbers might lose, but in larger numbers I think the AoE of ducks will win out. (Amph vs. Shield is dreadful for other reasons, though.) 1 ...I can't think of a raider Duck loses to reliably. Dagger's a bit of a coinflip (IIRC larger numbers favour Dagger), but Dagger shares the high alpha and currently questionable balance of Ducks anyway. You probably have to kite Bandits and in low numbers might lose, but in larger numbers I think the AoE of ducks will win out. (Amph vs. Shield is dreadful for other reasons, though.)
2 \n 2 \n
3 I'm not sure I've ever played amph vs. jump but three ducks onehit a Pyro and cost only marginally more so I can't imagine that going too badly. They might lose to Scorcher or Panther but I doubt it - and they definitely scale better. 3 I'm not sure I've ever played amph vs. jump but three ducks onehit a Pyro and cost only marginally more so I can't imagine that going too badly. They might lose to Scorcher or Panther but I doubt it - and they definitely scale better. Admittedly these latter two can abuse their mobility, but there are very few maps on which you could plausibly see that matchup in any case.
4 \n 4 \n
5 They are indeed slow but healing/hiding underwater is useful (if there's no water why did you play Amph?). 5 They are indeed slow but healing/hiding underwater is useful (if there's no water why did you play Amph?).
6 \n 6 \n
7 If you're proposing a buff to Duck without any nerfs to compensate I think I'm just going to have to laugh at you. It's possible they don't need a nerf but they're definitely on the powerful side of balanced. 7 If you're proposing a buff to Duck without any nerfs to compensate I think I'm just going to have to laugh at you. It's possible they don't need a nerf but they're definitely on the powerful side of balanced.