1 |
[quote]A com weapon can be balanced and useful. Building units will always be cost effective vs building a single vulnerable unit.[/quote]
|
1 |
[quote]A com weapon can be balanced and useful. Building units will always be cost effective vs building a single vulnerable unit.[/quote]
|
2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
3 |
Especially in the early minutes of 1v1 games, where raiders are the predominant (and kind of the only useful) units, a heavy weight unit like the com can definitely outclass your other options for front line crowd control.
|
3 |
Especially in the early minutes of 1v1 games, where raiders are the predominant (and kind of the only useful) units, a heavy weight unit like the com can definitely outclass your other options for front line crowd control.
|
4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
5 |
I
mean,
the
"Building
units
will
always
be
cost
effective
vs
building
a
single
vulnerable
unit"
is
even
trivially
easy
to
disprove.
|
5 |
I
mean,
the
"Building
units
will
always
be
cost
effective
vs
building
a
single
vulnerable
unit"
is
even
trivially
easy
to
disprove
and
goes
directly
against
the
notion
of
weight
as
a
balance
factor.
|