1 |
Well, thinking about it...
|
1 |
Well, thinking about it...
|
2 |
Consider these scenarios:
|
2 |
Consider these scenarios:
|
3 |
-5 people control 5 heroes
|
3 |
-5 people control 5 heroes
|
4 |
-1 person controls 5 heroes (e.g. 4 leavers in the team)
|
4 |
-1 person controls 5 heroes (e.g. 4 leavers in the team)
|
5 |
\n
|
5 |
\n
|
6 |
Is one of the two more like an RTS? If so, why?
|
6 |
Is one of the two more like an RTS? If so, why?
|
|
|
7 |
The latter definitely [i]feels[/i] more like an RTS. A well-coordinating team that thinks alike can definitely work the same way though.
|
|
|
8 |
\n
|
|
|
9 |
Sure, if one person controls 5 heroes, time is even more of a scarce resource, but it's (quite obviously) not like time is abundant when controlling one hero either. Your value maximization just works differently.
|
|
|
10 |
\n
|
|
|
11 |
And now consider that there's at least one hero in DotA that regularly gets to control 5 (almost identical) heroes that each have abilities.
|
|
|
12 |
\n
|
|
|
13 |
Is there a way to draw a clear line?
|