Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Raven

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
6/9/2015 3:38:18 PMRUrankYogzototh before revert after revert
6/9/2015 3:38:01 PMRUrankYogzototh before revert after revert
Before After
1 [quote]If you split Raven what are the relative powers of the two planes? Is the anti-static bomber better than Raven is now?[/quote] 1 [quote]If you split Raven what are the relative powers of the two planes? Is the anti-static bomber better than Raven is now?[/quote]
2 \n 2 \n
3 Anti-static: 3 Anti-static:
4 Moderate cost (400), high altitude, high health, relatively slow speed, doesnt dive. Drops a very tight cluster of 1-4 bombs that travel in proper ballistic trajectory and explode kinda like a small banisher missile - small AOE, but decent damage and cool loud explosion. 4 Moderate cost (400), high altitude, high health, relatively slow speed, doesnt dive. Drops a very tight cluster of 1-4 bombs that travel in proper ballistic trajectory and explode kinda like a small banisher missile - small AOE, but decent damage and cool loud explosion.
5 \n 5 \n
6 Anti-mobile: 6 Anti-mobile:
7 Relatively cheap ( 250-300) , medium altitude, relatively high speed, very low health ( 20%-30% lower than current raven) , low damage, can dive. 7 Relatively cheap ( 250-300) , medium altitude, relatively high speed, very low health ( 20%-30% lower than current raven) , low damage, can dive. The point is that the anti-mobile bombers should suffer losses even against position with very light AA, so bombing shit within enemy AA line of fire is a bad option.
8 \n
9 The point is that the anti-mobile bombers should suffer losses even against position with very light AA, so bombing shit within enemy AA line of fire is a bad option.
10 \n 8 \n
11 The reason you'd use anti-static over anti-mobile: Enemy has some defenders, or maybe 1-2 mobile AA units. Reason you'd use anti-static over Licho: cheaper, higher damage per cost, doesnt have a tendency to fucking miss, flies higher. 9 The reason you'd use anti-static over anti-mobile: Enemy has some defenders, or maybe 1-2 mobile AA units. Reason you'd use anti-static over Licho: cheaper, higher damage per cost, doesnt have a tendency to fucking miss, flies higher.