| 1 |
[quote] anyhow, you didnt discuss my game vs godde or drone vs godde yet. [/quote]
|
1 |
[quote] anyhow, you didnt discuss my game vs godde or drone vs godde yet. [/quote]
|
| 2 |
I haven't found time to do it yet, but i will later today. I haven't commented on those games, either. Also godde/fealthas where fealthas reportedly nearly won with domi spam vs reapers.
|
2 |
I haven't found time to do it yet, but i will later today. I haven't commented on those games, either. Also godde/fealthas where fealthas reportedly nearly won with domi spam vs reapers.
|
| 3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
| 4 |
[quote]it was you (specifically you 3 above posters) who decided that we need to do these matches and that they are conclusive[/quote]
|
4 |
[quote]it was you (specifically you 3 above posters) who decided that we need to do these matches and that they are conclusive[/quote]
|
| 5 |
I think [u]my[/u] claim was that a thing that is conclusive would be a set of 100 games occuring [i]after[/i] people had time to adapt to longer-range panther to figure out whether its new inaccuracy makes that buff irrelevant or not.
|
5 |
I think [u]my[/u] claim was that a thing that is conclusive would be a set of 100 games occuring [i]after[/i] people had time to adapt to longer-range panther to figure out whether its new inaccuracy makes that buff irrelevant or not.
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
That is:
|
7 |
That is:
|
| 8 |
1) One or two games are [b]not[/b] conclusive but do further the meta
|
8 |
1) One or two games are [b]not[/b] conclusive but do further the meta
|
| 9 |
2)
More
games
[b]should[/b]
be
played
|
9 |
2)
More
games
[b]should[/b]
be
played
becase
1
|
| 10 |
3) Empirical data > theorycraft
|
10 |
3) Empirical data > theorycraft
|
| 11 |
4) Statistics exist.
|
11 |
4) Statistics exist.
|
|
|
12 |
\n
|
|
|
13 |
My annoyance with the observation in the above post is that the three inferred statements form a contradiction triangle.
|
Vehicle antiheavy idea/neon