| 1 |
[quote]If someone already made the investment in rezzing units, [b][u]and the wreck is not about to get into enemy hands[/u][/b], then in almost all cases it is for the benefit of the TEAM to let the rezz continue undisturbed.[/quote]
|
1 |
[quote]If someone already made the investment in rezzing units, [b][u]and the wreck is not about to get into enemy hands[/u][/b], then in almost all cases it is for the benefit of the TEAM to let the rezz continue undisturbed.[/quote]
|
| 2 |
I think this accounts for more than half the times that I have seen somebody attempt to rez... and the majority of the times I have seen somebody get flamed for reclaiming the wreck.
|
2 |
I think this accounts for more than half the times that I have seen somebody attempt to rez... and the majority of the times I have seen somebody get flamed for reclaiming the wreck.
|
| 3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
| 4 |
I am fundamentally disinterested in some fool being able to say "no, you can't reclaim the wreck of my trollcom that I did something idiotic with, because I want to bring it to 5% rez before the enemy takes this ground".
|
4 |
I am fundamentally disinterested in some fool being able to say "no, you can't reclaim the wreck of my trollcom that I did something idiotic with, because I want to bring it to 5% rez before the enemy takes this ground".
|
|
|
5 |
\n
|
|
|
6 |
If somebody makes an investment in Athenas or rezcom, and they want to resurrect stuff [b]safely[/b], then that's fine by me. Go ahead. Introducing the capability to have such a player secure their rezzing is in no way worth giving the aforementioned fool the ability to throw the game.
|
|
|
7 |
\n
|
|
|
8 |
The possibility that a griefer could make his own team unable to reclaim any wrecks for the lulz is merely the icing on the this-is-a-bad-idea cake.
|
resurrection should have higher priority than reclamation