| 1 |
If the existence of the dgun module scares devs away from buffing their overall speed and survivability, remove that module. Dgun allows commanders to instakill units (and other commanders) without investing in damage at all.
|
1 |
If the existence of the dgun module scares devs away from buffing their overall speed and survivability, remove that module. Dgun allows commanders to instakill units (and other commanders) without investing in damage at all.
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
Even
if
they're
not
meant
to
be
competitive,
commander
options
should
at
least
be
balanced.
Currently
strike
commander
is
better
than
battle
commander
in
nearly
all
situations
involving
actual
combat,
because
of
speed
and
regen.
After
some
months
of
trying
different
builds,
nearly
all
useful
commander
builds
include
a
strike
commander
chassis,
machine
gun
and
the
drone
modules.
That's
boring.
|
3 |
Even
if
they're
not
meant
to
be
competitive,
commander
options
should
at
least
be
balanced.
Currently
strike
commander
is
better
than
battle
commander
in
nearly
all
situations
involving
actual
combat,
because
of
speed
and
regen.
After
some
months
of
trying
different
builds,
builds
that
use
strike
commander
chassis,
machine
gun
and
the
drone
modules
seem
to
be
more
effective
by
a
large
margin.
That's
boring.
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
\n
|
5 |
\n
|
| 6 |
I updated the first post, removing the commander ressurrection buff suggestion, the stun changes suggestion and partially reverting spectre and panther buffs, among other things, like removing the sumo suggestion which would probably lead to sumo airdrops being OP. I provided numeric values, but they were not meant to be "set in stone"...
|
6 |
I updated the first post, removing the commander ressurrection buff suggestion, the stun changes suggestion and partially reverting spectre and panther buffs, among other things, like removing the sumo suggestion which would probably lead to sumo airdrops being OP. I provided numeric values, but they were not meant to be "set in stone"...
|
| 7 |
\n
|
7 |
\n
|
| 8 |
\n
|
8 |
\n
|
| 9 |
[quote]"Makes sense" is a terrible design philosophy. [Because subjective][/quote]
|
9 |
[quote]"Makes sense" is a terrible design philosophy. [Because subjective][/quote]
|
| 10 |
:)
|
10 |
:)
|
| 11 |
\n
|
11 |
\n
|
| 12 |
You all seem too eager to dismiss the changes. Some of them even respect Quant's rule, look at the Cobra suggestion, or the Hawk suggestion. Others are just unit resizes (some models seem too small).
|
12 |
You all seem too eager to dismiss the changes. Some of them even respect Quant's rule, look at the Cobra suggestion, or the Hawk suggestion. Others are just unit resizes (some models seem too small).
|
| 13 |
\n
|
13 |
\n
|
| 14 |
With my suggestions, would the number of viable factories in any map actually decrease?
|
14 |
With my suggestions, would the number of viable factories in any map actually decrease?
|
| 15 |
\n
|
15 |
\n
|
suggestions (mainly balance changes)