Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Reducing the featured map-pool

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
2/19/2016 7:09:36 PMCZrankAdminLicho before revert after revert
2/19/2016 7:07:47 PMCZrankAdminLicho before revert after revert
Before After
1 Atm all maps that are featured can be autocycled by springies. 1 Atm all maps that are featured can be autocycled by springies.
2 All would also be valid for matchmaker. 2 All would also be valid for matchmaker.
3 \n 3 \n
4 On the other hand we should deploy all maps that can be played "without tinkering" just to cut down possible slowdowns and simplify matchmaker (assume you have all you need). 4 On the other hand we should deploy all maps that can be played "without tinkering" just to cut down possible slowdowns and simplify matchmaker (assume you have all you need).
5 \n 5 \n
6 Given this [b]it is[/b] best to reduce number of featured maps. 6 Given this [b]it is[/b] best to reduce number of featured maps.
7 \n 7 \n
8 It could also be screened for size, some maps are huge or they need spring features pack etc.. 8 It could also be screened for size, some maps are huge or they need spring features pack etc..
9 \n 9 \n
10 10 Introducing another flag ( "approved" along with "featured") does not make much sense, because basically all maps can be played and approved would not have any function.