| 1 |
[quote]No it's not. A player with a win:loss ratio of 5:50 can have higher elo than a player with 50:5 or even 55:0. [/quote]
|
1 |
[quote]No it's not. A player with a win:loss ratio of 5:50 can have higher elo than a player with 50:5 or even 55:0. [/quote]
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
Irregardless
of
weather
or
not
I
have
the
right
definition
of
elo
is
unconcerning.
The
point
still
stands:
Do
not
instantly
blame
your
low
"elo"
players
for
your
loss.
|
3 |
Irregardless
of
whether
or
not
I
have
the
right
definition
of
elo
is
beside
the
point.
The
point
still
stands:
Do
not
instantly
blame
your
low
"elo"
players
for
your
loss.
If
you
disagree
with
this
point,
you're
welcome
to
refute
that
point.
|
|
|
4 |
\n
|
|
|
5 |
It still stands as a silly number people get worked up over and instantly blame their team for losing 1-50 magical fake internet ego points.
|
|
|
6 |
\n
|
|
|
7 |
[quote]How do you define "skill" if not as "the influence of a player on whether the game is won by their team or not"? [/quote]
|
|
|
8 |
\n
|
|
|
9 |
Knowledge of mechanics and interactions and ability to exploit game state conditions and mechanics to produce a beneficial effect.
|
Balance