Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

COC violations

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
5/15/2016 7:20:25 PMUSrankCrazyEddie before revert after revert
5/15/2016 7:15:14 PMUSrankCrazyEddie before revert after revert
Before After
1 Specific words are not against the Code of Conduct. Nor should they be. What is against the CoC is being hostile and abusive. That includes calling someone something that is meant to be insulting, regardless of the word used. 1 Specific words are not against the Code of Conduct. Nor should they be. What is against the CoC is being hostile and abusive. That includes calling someone something that is meant to be insulting, regardless of the word used.
2 \n
3 Note that good-natured banter is tolerated, even if it uses words that would otherwise be insulting.
4 \n
5 How can you tell the difference between good-natured banter and abuse? If the other party was upset by it and reported you for it, then you probably crossed the line. That's one reason that Snugglebass properly discounted Matsuda's complaint in the OP - he wasn't upset by it.