Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

ELO Changes

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
9/26/2016 1:41:50 PMCHrankAdminDeinFreund before revert after revert
9/26/2016 1:37:17 PMCHrankAdminDeinFreund before revert after revert
9/26/2016 1:36:56 PMCHrankAdminDeinFreund before revert after revert
Before After
1 [quote]for mostly curiousity, I would like to see data for (2v2 - 4v4), and (4v4 - 16v16).[/quote] 1 [quote]for mostly curiousity, I would like to see data for (2v2 - 4v4), and (4v4 - 16v16).[/quote]
2 I have posted those values [url=http://zero-k.info/Forum/Thread/22899]here[/url](Small Teams/Big Teams). But as I've seen when measuring their significance, they are completely pointless to look at. Be happy if you're on top, you won the dice roll! 2 I have posted those values [url=http://zero-k.info/Forum/Thread/22899]here[/url](Small Teams/Big Teams). But as I've seen when measuring their significance, they are completely pointless to look at. Be happy if you're on top, you won the dice roll!
3 \n 3 \n
4 [quote]Dein also states certain results do not reflect true skill level, I didnt know Dein had a true skill level gauge to compare this stuff too. [/quote] 4 [quote]Dein also states certain results do not reflect true skill level, I didnt know Dein had a true skill level gauge to compare this stuff too. [/quote]
5 Indeed I do, also you didn't read [url=http://zero-k.info/Forum/Thread/22898]how I calculate things[/url]. 5 Indeed I do, also you didn't read [url=http://zero-k.info/Forum/Thread/22898]how I calculate things[/url].
6 \n 6 \n
7 @malric 7 @malric
8 Same link goes for you, all I'm doing is exactly that: If 3 1900 loses vs 3 1500 the system is wrong, and that's what happens with the old values. This is why there is no point in the Team/1v1 ELO values when we have combined ones. 8 Same link goes for you, all I'm doing is exactly that: If 3 1900 loses vs 3 1500 the system is wrong, and that's what happens with the old values. This is why there is no point in the Team/1v1 ELO values when we have combined ones.
9 \n
10 [quote]I like to see ladders. I did not feel that the previous ladder was incorrect, on the contrary I had a feeling that was "generally" ok.[/quote]
11 You did? You think you 1v1 ELO of ~1300 was correct? It could hardly be any more wrong.