| 1 |
[quote]
|
1 |
[quote]
|
| 2 |
Its a bi weekly, I don't expect that many people to show up for the first one anyways. Also, I've never seen anyone ever write dates like that, which is probably why I don't.[/quote]
|
2 |
Its a bi weekly, I don't expect that many people to show up for the first one anyways. Also, I've never seen anyone ever write dates like that, which is probably why I don't.[/quote]
|
| 3 |
If
this
goes
well
I'd
recommend
making
it
more
of
a
league
format,
where
every
week
you
get
some
amount
of
"league
points"
for
standings
[color=gray](
likely
in
a
swiss
format)
[/color],
and
the
highest
8
or
so
do
a
final
bracket
tournament.
This
sort
of
thing
would
take
time
to
build
momentum.
|
3 |
If
this
goes
well
I'd
recommend
making
it
more
of
a
league
format,
where
every
week
you
get
some
amount
of
"league
points"
for
standings
[color=gray](
likely
in
a
swiss
format)
[/color],
and
the
highest
8
or
so
do
a
final
bracket
tournament.
This
sort
of
thing
would
take
time
to
build
momentum,
but
if
pushed
right
would
help
1v1
play
become
more
popular.
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
Also, date formats like 2017/09/08 are pretty standard in computer stuff [color=gray](they are the easiest to sort. Also, the ISO standard cited in the linked comic allows for separators other than '-')[/color] and fairly clear. Even if it is unfamiliar to you, it's clearest to everyone else.
|
5 |
Also, date formats like 2017/09/08 are pretty standard in computer stuff [color=gray](they are the easiest to sort. Also, the ISO standard cited in the linked comic allows for separators other than '-')[/color] and fairly clear. Even if it is unfamiliar to you, it's clearest to everyone else.
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
[quote]If you type those maps without version specification in lobby it will autopull latest version.[/quote]
|
7 |
[quote]If you type those maps without version specification in lobby it will autopull latest version.[/quote]
|
| 8 |
I'm with Sprung on this one. A consistent format for map names is much friendlier than a weird mix, especially since there aren't line breaks or a proper list format [color=gray](at least on Firefox)[/color]. I get that some maps are unversioned, and for those ones not having a version number at the end makes sense, but as long as the name format is consistent and all the names can be copy/pasted into the "/map" command, it will work. Also, specifying version has the added benefit of making any archival reviewing of earlier tournament rulesets and mapsets easier.
|
8 |
I'm with Sprung on this one. A consistent format for map names is much friendlier than a weird mix, especially since there aren't line breaks or a proper list format [color=gray](at least on Firefox)[/color]. I get that some maps are unversioned, and for those ones not having a version number at the end makes sense, but as long as the name format is consistent and all the names can be copy/pasted into the "/map" command, it will work. Also, specifying version has the added benefit of making any archival reviewing of earlier tournament rulesets and mapsets easier.
|
| 9 |
\n
|
9 |
\n
|
| 10 |
[quote]This is the first freaking tournament and I already have people picking the damn ruleset apart, jesus.[/quote]
|
10 |
[quote]This is the first freaking tournament and I already have people picking the damn ruleset apart, jesus.[/quote]
|
| 11 |
It's your fourth tournament [color=gray](at least)[/color]. Also, people will pick the ruleset apart, since clarity in rulesets is paramount to running a tournament smoothly.
|
11 |
It's your fourth tournament [color=gray](at least)[/color]. Also, people will pick the ruleset apart, since clarity in rulesets is paramount to running a tournament smoothly.
|
| 12 |
\n
|
12 |
\n
|
Zero-K Biweekly 9/8/17