| 1 |
[quote]My understanding is that casual and competitive seed for each other a bit[/quote]
|
1 |
[quote]My understanding is that casual and competitive seed for each other a bit[/quote]
|
| 2 |
Casual briefly included data from Competitive, but then @Godde complained and now they are completely split.
|
2 |
Casual briefly included data from Competitive, but then @Godde complained and now they are completely split.
|
| 3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
| 4 |
[quote]Also WHR is garbage. It doesn't work when people are improving and they always do. Just at different paces.[/quote]
|
4 |
[quote]Also WHR is garbage. It doesn't work when people are improving and they always do. Just at different paces.[/quote]
|
| 5 |
You're entirely wrong. WHR does all those things and just looking at skill graphs of people who played for over a month should make it obvious.
|
5 |
You're entirely wrong. WHR does all those things and just looking at skill graphs of people who played for over a month should make it obvious.
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
[quote]Tbh the current system simply promotes smurfing because of the way of how easy it is to gain ranking as a new player. [/quote]
|
7 |
[quote]Tbh the current system simply promotes smurfing because of the way of how easy it is to gain ranking as a new player. [/quote]
|
| 8 |
What? I thought people smurfed to get easier matches. WHR converging much faster means you get less games per smurf account before you're at your true level.
|
8 |
What? I thought people smurfed to get easier matches. WHR converging much faster means you get less games per smurf account before you're at your true level.
|
| 9 |
\n
|
9 |
\n
|
| 10 |
[quote]The more you play the harder it is for you to climb. The system simply discourages players from playing the game.[/quote]
|
10 |
[quote]The more you play the harder it is for you to climb. The system simply discourages players from playing the game.[/quote]
|
| 11 |
My dude, you should really lay off that contrarianism! Not only was this true with regular old elo, but are you suggesting grinding the stat is the only reason to play? But then ZK is just a shitty ProgressQuest ripoff.
|
11 |
My dude, you should really lay off that contrarianism! Not only was this true with regular old elo, but are you suggesting grinding the stat is the only reason to play? But then ZK is just a shitty ProgressQuest ripoff.
|
| 12 |
\n
|
12 |
\n
|
| 13 |
[quote]The more you play the better you get at the game. Yet WHR just simply ignores that time and assumes that long term monthly improvements are more important.[/quote]
|
13 |
[quote]The more you play the better you get at the game. Yet WHR just simply ignores that time and assumes that long term monthly improvements are more important.[/quote]
|
| 14 |
I don't think WHR has any special monthly routines. Or that it ignores progress. This is just weird.
|
14 |
I don't think WHR has any special monthly routines. Or that it ignores progress. This is just weird.
|
|
|
15 |
\n
|
|
|
16 |
[quote]It's funny because DrDoom is probably about as good as me, if not better. Yet after 500 games he was still way down at rank #40 whilst I was at #12 after about a dozen games because I'd barely played ZK at all. [/quote]
|
|
|
17 |
I think you are underselling yourself. I don't remember losing duels to Doom.
|
matchmaking & rank insecurity