| 1 |
I've been thinking about how Nuke/Anti Nuke interactions could be made more interesting.
|
1 |
I've been thinking about how Nuke/Anti Nuke interactions could be made more interesting.
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
I thought it would be interesting to have a second missile available to the Nuke Silo - a cheaper decoy missile without a warhead.
|
3 |
I thought it would be interesting to have a second missile available to the Nuke Silo - a cheaper decoy missile without a warhead.
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
This would make it possible for players to "scout" for Anti-missile presence by firing a dummy missile first; or easier for two Nuke Silo to brute force one Anti-nuke by allowing one of them to cheaply decoy Anti-missile projectiles.
|
5 |
This would make it possible for players to "scout" for Anti-missile presence by firing a dummy missile first; or easier for two Nuke Silo to brute force one Anti-nuke by allowing one of them to cheaply decoy Anti-missile projectiles.
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
Since Nuke is intended to be an end-game weapon, this would make Nuke vs Anti warfare more of a slippery slope and add a bit more room for counter play vs a relentlessly turtling opponent with multiple inaccessible anti-nukes.
|
7 |
Since Nuke is intended to be an end-game weapon, this would make Nuke vs Anti warfare more of a slippery slope and add a bit more room for counter play vs a relentlessly turtling opponent with multiple inaccessible anti-nukes.
|
| 8 |
\n
|
8 |
\n
|
| 9 |
Plus it could make a comedy "dropped accordion" noise on impact.
|
9 |
Plus it could make a comedy "dropped accordion" noise on impact.
|
|
|
10 |
\n
|
|
|
11 |
Generally having some cool endgame alternative missiles available in the Silo (all the same cost or greater, all blocked by anti) seems like a low-cost low-effort source of cool and lols. Like an enormous implosion, an enormous impulse or a tine AOE hyper damage singularity missile.
|
New missile for Nuke Silo