Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Racketeers problem

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
1/18/2019 12:08:48 AMNLrankWesley before revert after revert
1/18/2019 12:07:52 AMNLrankWesley before revert after revert
1/18/2019 12:05:16 AMNLrankWesley before revert after revert
1/18/2019 12:01:50 AMNLrankWesley before revert after revert
Before After
1 Yes, simply disarming a heavy unit should come at a lower cost than being able to kill it. 1 Yes, simply disarming a heavy unit should come at a lower cost than being able to kill it.
2 \n 2 \n
3 Edit: also racketeer should auto overlap its shots. 3 Edit: also racketeer should auto overlap its shots.
4 \n 4 \n
5 Edit2: 2 shots is already 700 metal spend on 2 single target anti heavy units that deal 0 dmg. Might aswell get 2 tb's and aoe disarm his whole army instead of just the heavy's. 5 Edit2: 2 shots is already 700 metal spend on 2 single target anti heavy units that deal 0 dmg. Might aswell get 2 tb's and aoe disarm his whole army instead of just 1 heavy.