1 |
[quote]Ships already have an LRFS. It's called "mistral"[/quote]
|
1 |
[quote]Ships already have an LRFS. It's called "mistral"[/quote]
|
2 |
Mistral is a skirmisher. I already have a low opinion of this "LRFS" nomenclature even before stretching the definition to include something that doesn't outrange Picket.
|
2 |
Mistral is a skirmisher. I already have a low opinion of this "LRFS" nomenclature even before stretching the definition to include something that doesn't outrange Picket.
|
3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
4 |
[quote]and griz can't kill subs[/quote]
|
4 |
[quote]and griz can't kill subs[/quote]
|
5 |
So?
The
fact
remains
that
Grizzly
is
(
probably)
the
pre-superweapon
endgame
for
sea
since
there's
no
way
to
significantly
injure
it
(
let
alone
kill
it)
without
getting
very
close
to
it.
|
5 |
So?
The
fact
remains
that
Grizzly,
not
Envoy/Shogun,
is
(
probably)
the
pre-superweapon
endgame
for
sea
since
there's
no
way
to
significantly
injure
it
(
let
alone
kill
it)
without
getting
very
close
to
it.
|
6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
7 |
[quote]Why does shipfac get to have units to wtfpwn everything while amphs are half retarded?[/quote]
|
7 |
[quote]Why does shipfac get to have units to wtfpwn everything while amphs are half retarded?[/quote]
|
8 |
I don't accept the premise here in that I think Duck is not at all bad and on a map which is small enough or bogged down enough Scallop + Buoy/Grizzly is a quite formidable force. That being said it is generally felt that ships should be more powerful than hover/amph in the water.
|
8 |
I don't accept the premise here in that I think Duck is not at all bad and on a map which is small enough or bogged down enough Scallop + Buoy/Grizzly is a quite formidable force. That being said it is generally felt that ships should be more powerful than hover/amph in the water.
|