| 1 |
@Manored:
|
1 |
@Manored:
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
ok, then i will ask from another point of view:
|
3 |
ok, then i will ask from another point of view:
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
how long does 1 glaive need to destroy:
|
5 |
how long does 1 glaive need to destroy:
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
1 Solar (closing included)
|
7 |
1 Solar (closing included)
|
| 8 |
1 Factory
|
8 |
1 Factory
|
| 9 |
1 Windgen
|
9 |
1 Windgen
|
| 10 |
1 Mex
|
10 |
1 Mex
|
| 11 |
\n
|
11 |
\n
|
| 12 |
yes, it´s only one glaive, but it´s about the difference in time, not the total amount.
|
12 |
yes, it´s only one glaive, but it´s about the difference in time, not the total amount.
|
| 13 |
\n
|
13 |
\n
|
| 14 |
\n
|
14 |
\n
|
| 15 |
solars take ages, factories take ages, windgens die fast, mexes die fast.
|
15 |
solars take ages, factories take ages, windgens die fast, mexes die fast.
|
| 16 |
\n
|
16 |
\n
|
| 17 |
\n
|
17 |
\n
|
| 18 |
i want to adress 2 things here:
|
18 |
i want to adress 2 things here:
|
| 19 |
\n
|
19 |
\n
|
| 20 |
- if you are worried about your energy-structures, go for solars, especially on easy to acces terrain.
|
20 |
- if you are worried about your energy-structures, go for solars, especially on easy to acces terrain.
|
| 21 |
\n
|
21 |
\n
|
| 22 |
- mexes already have an implemented buffer, reclaiming them gives you back a good amount of their cost. Thats why it´s better to raid energy instead of mexes. e-stalling means you can´t use the reclaim at once, so you don´t have that buffer. Even a larger amount of glaives has trouble killing solars without standing still for some time, wich is pretty detrimental to then normally.
|
22 |
- mexes already have an implemented buffer, reclaiming them gives you back a good amount of their cost. Thats why it´s better to raid energy instead of mexes. e-stalling means you can´t use the reclaim at once, so you don´t have that buffer. Even a larger amount of glaives has trouble killing solars without standing still for some time, wich is pretty detrimental to then normally.
|
| 23 |
\n
|
23 |
\n
|
| 24 |
To put it bluntly:
|
24 |
To put it bluntly:
|
| 25 |
I think the raider-problem is exaggerated.
|
25 |
I think the raider-problem is exaggerated.
|
| 26 |
\n
|
26 |
\n
|
| 27 |
1.
Sure,
you
will
lose
1
or
2
mexes
sometimes,
but
this
is
the
"natural"
flow
of
the
game
and
does
not
hurt
as
much
as
long
as
you
rebuild
fast
enough.
Expansion
is
a
fluid
process
nothing
that
reaches
a
stable
point
and
then
never
changes.
If
a
raid
gets
ALL
your
mexes,
yes
thats
pretty
detrimental,
but
a
lot
of
things
have
to
have
been
gone
wrong
beforehand
that
that
happens.
|
27 |
1.
Sure,
you
will
lose
1
or
2
mexes
sometimes,
but
this
is
the
"natural"
flow
of
the
game
and
does
not
hurt
as
much
as
long
as
you
rebuild
fast
enough.
Expansion
is
a
fluid
process,
nothing
that
reaches
a
stable
point
and
then
never
changes
again.
If
a
raid
gets
ALL
your
mexes,
yes
thats
pretty
detrimental,
but
a
lot
of
things
have
to
have
been
gone
wrong
beforehand
that
that
happens.
|
| 28 |
\n
|
28 |
\n
|
| 29 |
2. To protect my builders Riots are sufficient because they are not slower than builders usually. And if i don´t need to protect my base from enemy-raiders, why would i have to build some of them myself at all? ? Pork is way better locally.
|
29 |
2. To protect my builders Riots are sufficient because they are not slower than builders usually. And if i don´t need to protect my base from enemy-raiders, why would i have to build some of them myself at all? ? Pork is way better locally.
|
Returning observation