Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

24/7 High Elo Team Lobbies

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
3/31/2020 4:09:41 PMunknownrankTinySpider before revert after revert
3/31/2020 4:06:50 PMunknownrankTinySpider before revert after revert
3/31/2020 4:05:14 PMunknownrankTinySpider before revert after revert
Before After
1 [q]I was an avid supporter of the split command and can corroborate GoogleFrog's observations.[/q]
2 \n
1 Since all of you seem to agree that that was indeed the result as @GoogleFrog claims I'll take your word for it. 3 Since all of you seem to agree that that was indeed the result as @GoogleFrog claims I'll take your word for it.
2 \n 4 \n
3 Upon rereading the conversation I noticed that this split you talked about was not enforced, as in anyone could simply rejoin the higher/lower elo room. That is a simple problem to correct, by disallowing the lower elo players from joining the higher elo room and the higher elo players from joining the lower elo room. Elo limit would apply to spectators too to discourage idling in favour of playing. 5 Upon rereading the conversation I noticed that this split you talked about was not enforced, as in anyone could simply rejoin the higher/lower elo room. That is a simple problem to correct, by disallowing the lower elo players from joining the higher elo room and the higher elo players from joining the lower elo room. Elo limit would apply to spectators too to discourage idling in favour of playing.
4 \n 6 \n
5 You could have: 7 You could have:
6 1 server for any elo 8 1 server for any elo
7 1 server for high elo 9 1 server for high elo
8 1 server for non-high elo 10 1 server for non-high elo
9 \n 11 \n
10 Mixing shit players with not shit players is making the game worse for both parties. 12 Mixing shit players with not shit players is making the game worse for both parties.