| 1 |
[quote]how are we going to judge the bet[/quote]
|
1 |
[quote]how are we going to judge the bet[/quote]
|
| 2 |
Would you agree that one testable prediction of the thesis that Bill Gates, a highly competent and rich man - and especially competent and rich in the context of theories such as yours - was planning to do a thing, is that he would then find at least partial success in doing that thing?
|
2 |
Would you agree that one testable prediction of the thesis that Bill Gates, a highly competent and rich man - and especially competent and rich in the context of theories such as yours - was planning to do a thing, is that he would then find at least partial success in doing that thing?
|
| 3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
| 4 |
We
can
find
quite
decent
evidence
for
this
being
true:
Gates
does
seem
quite,
if
partially,
successful
in
eliminating
malaria
and
polio
-
and
again,
if
you
grant
him
competence
required
by
theories
such
as
yours,
in
a
targeted
reduction
of
global
population
with
either
a
highly
well-engineered
set
of
chemicals
covertly
added
to
the
vaccines
spread
by
his
foundation,
or
even
a
targeted
release
of
an
incredibly
well-engineered
biological
agent.
I'm
not
sure
you
subscribe
to
these;
but
it
still
highlights
that
he
seems
to
be
extremely
good
at
reaching
his
goals.
|
4 |
We
can
find
quite
decent
evidence
for
this
being
true:
Gates
does
seem
quite,
if
partially,
successful
in
eliminating
malaria
and
polio
-
and
again,
if
you
grant
him
competence
required
by
theories
such
as
yours,
he
is
also
reasonably
successful
in
a
targeted
reduction
of
global
population
with
either
a
highly
well-engineered
set
of
chemicals
covertly
added
to
the
vaccines
spread
by
his
foundation,
or
even
a
targeted
release
of
an
incredibly
well-engineered
biological
agent.
I'm
not
sure
you
subscribe
to
these;
but
it
still
highlights
that
he
seems
to
be
extremely
good
at
reaching
his
goals.
|
| 5 |
\n
|
5 |
\n
|
| 6 |
If yes, then we could measure the bet by the number of humans known to be barcoded with invisible ink by some specific date (such as the end of 2020 or 2021). If you additionally hold that this program is going to be deployed in the open, and under mandatory basis, then we could easily use the program's own reports as sources of data.
|
6 |
If yes, then we could measure the bet by the number of humans known to be barcoded with invisible ink by some specific date (such as the end of 2020 or 2021). If you additionally hold that this program is going to be deployed in the open, and under mandatory basis, then we could easily use the program's own reports as sources of data.
|
Covid 19 conversation