Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Teams room rearrangement trial

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
7/18/2020 4:45:17 PMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
7/18/2020 4:25:06 PMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
Before After
1 The current arrangement is not, repeat *not*, intended to be a competition between the clan-balance and individual-balance rooms to see which is more popular. @Firepluk is quite right that the seeding problem would introduce a lot of skew in trying to draw those kind of conclusions. 1 The current arrangement is not, repeat *not*, intended to be a competition between the clan-balance and individual-balance rooms to see which is more popular. @Firepluk is quite right that the seeding problem would introduce a lot of skew in trying to draw those kind of conclusions.
2 \n 2 \n
3 The purpose is to see if we can arrange a state of affairs where both the people who prefer clan balance and the people who prefer individual balance get what they want some of the time, and when the number of available players permits it for both to get what they want at the same time. 3 The purpose is to see if we can arrange a state of affairs where both the people who prefer clan balance and the people who prefer individual balance get what they want some of the time, and when the number of available players permits it for both to get what they want at the same time. It is also a test to see whether two rooms will seed meaningfully more often when there are a set of people who really want to play with the ruleset of one room and not the other.
4 \n 4 \n
5 That does necessarily involve the people who really want to play 16v16 (as opposed to 10v10) not getting what they want at the same time... but those people have gotten what they want for a long time up until now, and I fully anticipate that no matter how this turns out there will still be at a minimum fairly regular opportunities to play 16v16 in the future. 5 That does necessarily involve the people who really want to play 16v16 (as opposed to 10v10) not getting what they want at the same time... but those people have gotten what they want for a long time up until now, and I fully anticipate that no matter how this turns out there will still be at a minimum fairly regular opportunities to play 16v16 in the future.