| 1 |
[quote]feel free to suggest improvements to the COC.[/quote]
|
1 |
[quote]feel free to suggest improvements to the COC.[/quote]
|
| 2 |
To be fair, he did do this in passing. I'm not sure that it is a good idea to bloat the Code of Conduct by adding a bunch of super-specific statements about stuff that happens rarely, especially given that not every edge case would be covered anyway.
|
2 |
To be fair, he did do this in passing. I'm not sure that it is a good idea to bloat the Code of Conduct by adding a bunch of super-specific statements about stuff that happens rarely, especially given that not every edge case would be covered anyway.
|
| 3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
| 4 |
Perhaps a separate supplementary list of such things could be made.
|
4 |
Perhaps a separate supplementary list of such things could be made.
|
| 5 |
\n
|
5 |
\n
|
| 6 |
[quote]Don't you think it makes you look just a little petulant to purposely spell someone's name wrong?[/quote]
|
6 |
[quote]Don't you think it makes you look just a little petulant to purposely spell someone's name wrong?[/quote]
|
| 7 |
I've seen that particular misreading often enough that it no longer surprises me. (More often on voice comms though.)
|
7 |
I've seen that particular misreading often enough that it no longer surprises me. (More often on voice comms though.)
|
| 8 |
\n
|
8 |
\n
|
| 9 |
[quote]The code of conduct is offered to the players as a behaviorial guideline. It is not in any way a binding agreement.[/quote]
|
9 |
[quote]The code of conduct is offered to the players as a behaviorial guideline. It is not in any way a binding agreement.[/quote]
|
| 10 |
This should not be taken to mean that the moderators exceed the Code of Conduct willy-nilly. Occasionally a decision will be made which is either not covered by the Code of Conduct or is based on a much broader reading of it than is usually made, but this kind of thing is generally only done (a) to preserve the sanity of the community or (b) to preserve the sanity of the moderators/developers.
|
10 |
This should not be taken to mean that the moderators exceed the Code of Conduct willy-nilly. Occasionally a decision will be made which is either not covered by the Code of Conduct or is based on a much broader reading of it than is usually made, but this kind of thing is generally only done (a) to preserve the sanity of the community or (b) to preserve the sanity of the moderators/developers.
|
| 11 |
\n
|
11 |
\n
|
| 12 |
For example:
|
12 |
For example:
|
| 13 |
- DaKeys' bans were not all based on a reading of the Code of Conduct that had a meaningful amount of precedent, but it clearly needed doing so it was done anyway.
|
13 |
- DaKeys' bans were not all based on a reading of the Code of Conduct that had a meaningful amount of precedent, but it clearly needed doing so it was done anyway.
|
| 14 |
-
There
have
been
a
few
cases
of
people
annoying
developers/contributors
enough
to
significantly
impact
their
willingness
to
contribute
to
the
Zero-K
project
in
the
short
or
long
term.
We
do
what
is
necessary
to
avoid
that
outcome
for
the
good
of
the
project.
|
14 |
-
There
have
been
a
few
cases
of
people
annoying
developers/contributors
in
such
a
way
as
to
significantly
impact
their
willingness
to
contribute
to
the
Zero-K
project
in
the
short
or
long
term.
We
do
what
is
necessary
to
avoid
that
outcome
for
the
good
of
the
project.
|
| 15 |
\n
|
15 |
\n
|
| 16 |
(In contrast I believe people have been outright banned for exit vote abuse in the past.)
|
16 |
(In contrast I believe people have been outright banned for exit vote abuse in the past.)
|
how to contact admin