1 |
@Kapy
don`t
worry,
all
those
widgets
are
abusable
by
the
enemy
as
well.
If
your
opponent
is
to
weak
to
"babysit"
their
units,
they
won`t
be
able
to
react
to
your
stuff
either.
.
.
(
A
scout
retreating
completely
pointless
and
your
armies
should
move
all
the
time
anyway.
if
you
play
well
this
widget
shouldn`t
even
activate.
It
is
more
a
phantom-solution
for
deeper-rooted
problems
that
wont
go
away
by
using
it.
)
|
1 |
@Kapy
don`t
worry,
all
those
widgets
are
abusable
by
the
enemy
as
well.
If
your
opponent
is
to
weak
to
"babysit"
their
units,
they
won`t
be
able
to
react
to
your
stuff
either.
.
.
(
A
scout
retreating
is
completely
pointless
and
your
armies
should
move
all
the
time
anyway.
if
you
play
well
this
widget
shouldn`t
even
activate.
It
is
more
a
phantom-solution
for
deeper-rooted
problems
that
wont
go
away
by
using
it.
)
|
2 |
TBH i was never really impressed with things like the pre-fire-widget because it was actually even worse than below-average micro. Actual cheats were things like the sniper-spot widget.
|
2 |
TBH i was never really impressed with things like the pre-fire-widget because it was actually even worse than below-average micro. Actual cheats were things like the sniper-spot widget.
|
3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
4 |
@Berder yes you designed it for darts, daggers etc. but does it only work on those? if not and it is usable with all units then it doesn`t matter what you wanted. the only thing that matters is what it is, not what you intended it to be.
|
4 |
@Berder yes you designed it for darts, daggers etc. but does it only work on those? if not and it is usable with all units then it doesn`t matter what you wanted. the only thing that matters is what it is, not what you intended it to be.
|
5 |
\n
|
5 |
\n
|
6 |
@sprang so why don`t you zoom out?
|
6 |
@sprang so why don`t you zoom out?
|
7 |
\n
|
7 |
\n
|
8 |
@GoogleFrog could we get this in the next stable maybe? What i would find annoying is if this became a standart thing but you would need to know about it from this forum-post and then bother to implement it.
|
8 |
@GoogleFrog could we get this in the next stable maybe? What i would find annoying is if this became a standart thing but you would need to know about it from this forum-post and then bother to implement it.
|