| 1 |
I will grant that I can't absolutely rule out that since the last time it was in the map pool and polled poorly, Hide and Seek has acquired enough fans to offset the fact that it has *also* acquired nearly 50% more bans than the second-most-banned map.
|
1 |
I will grant that I can't absolutely rule out that since the last time it was in the map pool and polled poorly, Hide and Seek has acquired enough fans to offset the fact that it has *also* acquired nearly 50% more bans than the second-most-banned map.
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
If more people throw some opinions into the thread one way or another it might become clearer whether it is worth running a poll in this instance to cover such cases.
|
3 |
If more people throw some opinions into the thread one way or another it might become clearer whether it is worth running a poll in this instance to cover such cases.
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
I do also acknowledge the argument that map bans make it safer to add maps into the pool... although adding a bunch of nonsense maps that people are then obliged to spend their bans on doesn't really seem like that great an idea. The pool of reasonable maps to put into the 1v1 MM pool is not *that* deep, once one eliminates the maps that are asymmetric, have technical problems, or frequently lead to poor gameplay.
|
5 |
I do also acknowledge the argument that map bans make it safer to add maps into the pool... although adding a bunch of nonsense maps that people are then obliged to spend their bans on doesn't really seem like that great an idea. The pool of reasonable maps to put into the 1v1 MM pool is not *that* deep, once one eliminates the maps that are asymmetric, have technical problems, or frequently lead to poor gameplay.
|
|
|
6 |
\n
|
|
|
7 |
For instance, "map bans exist" is not a good reason to add six sea maps to the pool.
|
1v1 Matchmaker Maps Rotation