| 1 |
[q] Impaler + widow is great against buildings, comms, heavies, and engineers alike[/q]
|
1 |
[q] Impaler + widow is great against buildings, comms, heavies, and engineers alike[/q]
|
| 2 |
Until the opponent realizes they can just nudge your target away by pushing it with other units. Now you're down a Widow and you've done zero damage.
|
2 |
Until the opponent realizes they can just nudge your target away by pushing it with other units. Now you're down a Widow and you've done zero damage.
|
| 3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
| 4 |
[q]Is Emissary intended to be anti-unit, anti-static or a flexible mix of both?[/q]
|
4 |
[q]Is Emissary intended to be anti-unit, anti-static or a flexible mix of both?[/q]
|
| 5 |
My read is that it's supposed to be both. Its job description is "general purpose artillery". Point towards enemy, watch them die. Poor man's Merlin.
|
5 |
My read is that it's supposed to be both. Its job description is "general purpose artillery". Point towards enemy, watch them die. Poor man's Merlin.
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
[q] Maybe tanks don't need emissary at all, and it should be removed instead of buffed. [/q]
|
7 |
[q] Maybe tanks don't need emissary at all, and it should be removed instead of buffed. [/q]
|
| 8 |
I was going to say that they need Emissary to stop Dominatrix, but actually Blitz seems sufficient in practice. In fact even Ripper spam barely stops Blitz.
|
8 |
I was going to say that they need Emissary to stop Dominatrix, but actually Blitz seems sufficient in practice. In fact even Ripper spam barely stops Blitz.
|
|
|
9 |
\n
|
|
|
10 |
[q]Lances ... higher HP[/q]
|
|
|
11 |
Emissary has 840 hp for 700 metal, while Lance has 1000 hp for 1000 metal. So i'm not sure if it's really tankier even if it's nominally tougher.
|
|
|
12 |
\n
|
|
|
13 |
That said, yeah, Lance is insane.
|
Buff emissary