Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

A thread about community management

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
10/10/2020 3:26:56 AMDErankkatastrophe before revert after revert
Before After
1 [q] Next time somebody leaves me hanging in a game, they will bear significant responsibility for the loss. And I might get frusturated, for which the blame situation is kind of murky. But if I get toxic at them over it, then THAT is my fault. [/q] 1 [q] Next time somebody leaves me hanging in a game, they will bear significant responsibility for the loss. And I might get frusturated, for which the blame situation is kind of murky. But if I get toxic at them over it, then THAT is my fault. [/q]
2 \n 2 \n
3 now this is the point i have been trying to get over all the time and it is exactly my point of view as well. 3 now this is the point i have been trying to get over all the time and it is exactly my point of view as well.
4 \n 4 \n
5 since i seem to fail to get my point across, let`s take a concrete example: 5 since i seem to fail to get my point across, let`s take a concrete example:
6 \n 6 \n
7 from recent battle chat: 7 from recent battle chat:
8 (names changed, look the up yourself if you are interested) 8 (names changed, look the up yourself if you are interested)
9 \n 9 \n
10 [23:17] PlayerA: PlayerB 1 more time u make useless fac we will kick u 10 [23:17] PlayerA: PlayerB 1 more time u make useless fac we will kick u
11 [23:18] PlayerB: PlayerA you need worried about your self 11 [23:18] PlayerB: PlayerA you need worried about your self
12 [23:18] PlayerA: iam that is why i will kick u if in my team 12 [23:18] PlayerA: iam that is why i will kick u if in my team
13 \n 13 \n
14 By no means is the thread to kick PlayerA ok, 14 By no means is the thread to kick PlayerA ok,
15 but at the same time PlayerB fails to realise that they form a team and that their actions have direct consequences for playerA. 15 but at the same time PlayerB fails to realise that they form a team and that their actions have direct consequences for playerA.
16 \n 16 \n
17 It is overly clear that PlayerA`s kick-threads are socially problematic. This, as well as other abuse such as insults, has been expressed countless times. The second point, at least to me is by far less prominent in public discussion and moderation. 17 It is overly clear that PlayerA`s kick-threads are socially problematic. This, as well as other abuse such as insults, has been expressed countless times. The second point, at least to me is by far less prominent in public discussion and moderation.
18 \n 18 \n
19 I don`t think PlayerB`s right not to be abused and PlayerA`s wish for a team-partner that understands their responsibility towards PlayerA are mutually exclusive. 19 I don`t think PlayerB`s right not to be abused and PlayerA`s wish for a team-partner that understands their responsibility towards PlayerA are mutually exclusive. To me it SEEMS ( and i am fully aware that that is subjective) that the common procedure would be to ( rightfully) warn PlayerA not to kick people while PlayerB gets ignored mostly. This has the tendency to annoy PlayerA even more as they feel marginalized towards PlayerB. This is the problem i was trying to adress when i said: "It was about trying to get you to move at least an inch to give all the frustrated players at least the feeling that their problems are noted and taken serious. "
20 \n
21 @GoogleFrog
22 \n
23 thank you. what you say makes a lot of sense and it contains a lot of thoughts that i have not considered yet.
24 \n
25 (need to go to bed, if i have anything to add i will do that later.)