| 1 |
@czesio i understand the reasons for your behaviour 100% (i have been there myself), but i can`t support it. you are not doing youself or your intentions a favour, and you are definitely not doing your actual teammates a favour.
|
1 |
@czesio i understand the reasons for your behaviour 100% (i have been there myself), but i can`t support it. you are not doing youself or your intentions a favour, and you are definitely not doing your actual teammates a favour.
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
| 4 |
[q] Top 80% players don't understand what's wrong with storages so they get a free pass. [/q]
|
4 |
[q] Top 80% players don't understand what's wrong with storages so they get a free pass. [/q]
|
| 5 |
\n
|
5 |
\n
|
| 6 |
i mean, are you sure for every case? is this still true after they have been told multiple times?
|
6 |
i mean, are you sure for every case? is this still true after they have been told multiple times?
|
| 7 |
\n
|
7 |
\n
|
| 8 |
|
8 |
Anarchid
|
| 9 |
[q] However, i don't see why we - or, to be honest you, both the plural of our player community and the singular AUrankSmokeDragon - should tolerate what is essentially griefing ("i will ruin the game on purpose for 20 people because i feel like it"). [/q]
|
9 |
[q] However, i don't see why we - or, to be honest you, both the plural of our player community and the singular AUrankSmokeDragon - should tolerate what is essentially griefing ("i will ruin the game on purpose for 20 people because i feel like it"). [/q]
|
| 10 |
\n
|
10 |
\n
|
| 11 |
Essentially
some
people
don`t
seem
to
aknowledge
the
difference
between
intentional
and
unintentional
behaviour,
or
they
see
it
but
don`t
care
about
it
because
the
effects
are
what
matters.
If
it`s
not
@czesio
that
spams
storages
or
cons,
it
will
be
someone
else.
And
clusterfuck
without
that
seems
to
have
become
really
rare.
|
11 |
Essentially
some
people
don`t
seem
to
aknowledge
the
difference
between
intentional
and
unintentional
behaviour,
or
they
see
it
but
don`t
care
about
it
because
the
effects
are
what
matters.
"If
it`s
not
@czesio
that
spams
storages
or
cons,
it
will
be
someone
else.
"
And
clusterfuck
without
that
seems
to
have
become
really
rare.
|
| 12 |
\n
|
12 |
\n
|
| 13 |
@Shaman
|
13 |
@Shaman
|
| 14 |
[q] 1.) Don't do stuff that you know has absolutely no chance of success or provides the team with no utility. (EG: storage only, making fields of cons, etc)
|
14 |
[q] 1.) Don't do stuff that you know has absolutely no chance of success or provides the team with no utility. (EG: storage only, making fields of cons, etc)
|
| 15 |
2.) Don't gloat about being useless and winning.
|
15 |
2.) Don't gloat about being useless and winning.
|
| 16 |
3.) Don't claim you're playing suboptimally with explicit purpose to ruin your team's chances of winning. (EG: "I need to lose elo anyways", etc)
|
16 |
3.) Don't claim you're playing suboptimally with explicit purpose to ruin your team's chances of winning. (EG: "I need to lose elo anyways", etc)
|
| 17 |
4.) Don't do it in small teams. [/q]
|
17 |
4.) Don't do it in small teams. [/q]
|
| 18 |
\n
|
18 |
\n
|
| 19 |
I totally support that and it`s my stand-point as well. (Although, a better version of "2" would be "Don`t taunt/trash-talk" in general, but i guess that is too restrictive for many people)
|
19 |
I totally support that and it`s my stand-point as well. (Although, a better version of "2" would be "Don`t taunt/trash-talk" in general, but i guess that is too restrictive for many people)
|
| 20 |
However it should be stressed that this is true for everyone fundamentally, just that you cannot know it beforehand when you are just new here, and thus new players are given the benefit of the doubt.
|
20 |
However it should be stressed that this is true for everyone fundamentally, just that you cannot know it beforehand when you are just new here, and thus new players are given the benefit of the doubt.
|
| 21 |
\n
|
21 |
\n
|
| 22 |
I think this is one of the games that lead to the outburst:
|
22 |
I think this is one of the games that lead to the outburst:
|
| 23 |
(THIS IS ONLY TAKEN AS AN EXAMPLE. I DO NOT WANT MOD-INTERVENTION AND I DON`T WANT TO LAY BLAME ON ANYONE NOR JUSTIFY ANY ABUSIVE BEHAVIOUR)
|
23 |
(THIS IS ONLY TAKEN AS AN EXAMPLE. I DO NOT WANT MOD-INTERVENTION AND I DON`T WANT TO LAY BLAME ON ANYONE NOR JUSTIFY ANY ABUSIVE BEHAVIOUR)
|
| 24 |
\n
|
24 |
\n
|
| 25 |
https://zero-k.info/Battles/Detail/971477
|
25 |
https://zero-k.info/Battles/Detail/971477
|
| 26 |
\n
|
26 |
\n
|
| 27 |
There is someone that builds 3 storages, pala (suicides it because send totally naked), then 3 detris. 1 nearly dies, gets pulled back (!) and repaired, then dies next time on front, second and third die the same way. THERE SHOULD BE NO MOD-ACTION imho, there is no reason to believe the behaviour has the intention of harming the team). Now the question is, at what point do you stop to give players the benefit of the doubt, e.G. when do they stop to be "new"?
|
27 |
There is someone that builds 3 storages, pala (suicides it because send totally naked), then 3 detris. 1 nearly dies, gets pulled back (!) and repaired, then dies next time on front, second and third die the same way. THERE SHOULD BE NO MOD-ACTION imho, there is no reason to believe the behaviour has the intention of harming the team). Now the question is, at what point do you stop to give players the benefit of the doubt, e.G. when do they stop to be "new"?
|
| 28 |
- Maybe the person doesn`t speak english. That would be one thing.
|
28 |
- Maybe the person doesn`t speak english. That would be one thing.
|
| 29 |
- If not and the tags of their teammates are read and understood, is it fair to assume the player knows after this game that this strategy will put them into deep conflict with their team?
|
29 |
- If not and the tags of their teammates are read and understood, is it fair to assume the player knows after this game that this strategy will put them into deep conflict with their team?
|
| 30 |
\n
|
30 |
\n
|
2 sets of rules