| 1 |
[quote]matcherino works with paypal?[/quote]
|
1 |
[quote]matcherino works with paypal?[/quote]
|
| 2 |
I
think
it
works
entirely
through
paypal.
Ive
never
trieed
cashing
out,
but
for
cashing
in,
paypal
is
the
only
option.
Alternatively,
i
guess
i
can
set
Licho
as
the
winner
and
then
ask
him
to
distribute
kudos
according
to
winners
request
|
2 |
I
think
it
works
entirely
through
paypal.
Ive
never
tried
cashing
out,
but
for
cashing
in
paypal
is
the
only
option.
Alternatively,
i
guess
i
can
set
Licho
as
the
winner
and
then
ask
him
to
distribute
kudos
according
to
winners
request
|
| 3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
[quote]can someone explain the sponsor thing pleas[/quote]
|
5 |
[quote]can someone explain the sponsor thing pleas[/quote]
|
| 6 |
Due to time limitations, there will be only 2 teams participating. What if more teams sign up?
|
6 |
Due to time limitations, there will be only 2 teams participating. What if more teams sign up?
|
| 7 |
Teams with higher average WHR will get priority. [b]BUT![/b] You can donate to the prize pool to have your team participate.
|
7 |
Teams with higher average WHR will get priority. [b]BUT![/b] You can donate to the prize pool to have your team participate.
|
| 8 |
[size=1.5]In hindsight, this does not make much sense since the team most likely to win the prize is going to the one with highest WHR, and its gonna be getting priority just for that anyway. The original idea was to do a "first come first serve" priority instead of WHR, but that puts us at greater risk of two terrible teams participating instead of best ones[/size]
|
8 |
[size=1.5]In hindsight, this does not make much sense since the team most likely to win the prize is going to the one with highest WHR, and its gonna be getting priority just for that anyway. The original idea was to do a "first come first serve" priority instead of WHR, but that puts us at greater risk of two terrible teams participating instead of best ones[/size]
|
| 9 |
\n
|
9 |
\n
|
| 10 |
[quote]75%>90%[/quote]
|
10 |
[quote]75%>90%[/quote]
|
| 11 |
I've already changed it to 100% because people dont like the idea of any cash staying in the system since there's no garantee of more similar events
|
11 |
I've already changed it to 100% because people dont like the idea of any cash staying in the system since there's no garantee of more similar events
|
| 12 |
[quote]no player swapping[/quote]
|
12 |
[quote]no player swapping[/quote]
|
| 13 |
The weaker team may choose not to swap. If they agree that the rule is stupid nobody is forcing them to use it. Or hopefully we will have 2 teams of very similar level and there wont be a need for anti-stack anyways
|
13 |
The weaker team may choose not to swap. If they agree that the rule is stupid nobody is forcing them to use it. Or hopefully we will have 2 teams of very similar level and there wont be a need for anti-stack anyways
|
| 14 |
[quote]games should be 5v5 or whatever size for each game of the series of 5, fixed game size for the whole event [/quote]
|
14 |
[quote]games should be 5v5 or whatever size for each game of the series of 5, fixed game size for the whole event [/quote]
|
| 15 |
No. The whole point of this event is to test teams flexibility in different-sized games, and to make them strategize on which players to pick for each match.
|
15 |
No. The whole point of this event is to test teams flexibility in different-sized games, and to make them strategize on which players to pick for each match.
|
| 16 |
\n
|
16 |
\n
|
Zero-K Team Battle! No cash prize! No pre-made teams